rs61744561

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001184880.2(PCDH19):​c.2469G>A​(p.Leu823Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00147 in 1,210,055 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. There are 445 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L823L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 10 hom., 218 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 9 hom. 227 hem. )

Consequence

PCDH19
NM_001184880.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.66

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCDH19 (HGNC:14270): (protocadherin 19) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the delta-2 protocadherin subclass of the cadherin superfamily. The encoded protein is thought to be a calcium-dependent cell-adhesion protein that is primarily expressed in the brain. Mutations in this gene on human chromosome X are associated with sporadic infantile epileptic encephalopathy and to a female-restricted form of epilepsy (EFMR; also known as PCDH19RE). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]
PCDH19 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 9
    Inheritance: XL, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • X-linked complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Dravet syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant X-100402671-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-100402671-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93673.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.66 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00749 (839/112034) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.026 (802/30843). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0245. There are 10 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 218 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 839 AD,XL,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PCDH19NM_001184880.2 linkc.2469G>A p.Leu823Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 6 ENST00000373034.8 NP_001171809.1 Q8TAB3-1
PCDH19NM_001105243.2 linkc.2328G>A p.Leu776Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 5 NP_001098713.1 Q8TAB3-2B3KU71
PCDH19NM_020766.3 linkc.2328G>A p.Leu776Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 5 NP_065817.2 Q8TAB3-3B3KU71

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCDH19ENST00000373034.8 linkc.2469G>A p.Leu823Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 6 1 NM_001184880.2 ENSP00000362125.4 Q8TAB3-1
PCDH19ENST00000255531.8 linkc.2328G>A p.Leu776Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 5 1 ENSP00000255531.7 Q8TAB3-2
PCDH19ENST00000420881.6 linkc.2328G>A p.Leu776Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 5 1 ENSP00000400327.2 Q8TAB3-3
PCDH19ENST00000636150.1 linkc.66-96G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 5 ENSP00000490463.1 A0A1B0GVC8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00747
AC:
836
AN:
111985
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000940
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00397
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00218
AC:
396
AN:
181280
AF XY:
0.00129
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0281
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00113
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000859
AC:
943
AN:
1098021
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000625
AC XY:
227
AN XY:
363395
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0293
AC:
774
AN:
26400
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00148
AC:
52
AN:
35199
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19385
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30203
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000924
AC:
5
AN:
54129
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40500
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000484
AC:
2
AN:
4136
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000273
AC:
23
AN:
841998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
87
AN:
46071
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
52
105
157
210
262
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00749
AC:
839
AN:
112034
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00637
AC XY:
218
AN XY:
34220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0260
AC:
802
AN:
30843
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00244
AC:
26
AN:
10646
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2646
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3538
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2631
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6107
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
219
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000940
AC:
5
AN:
53190
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00392
AC:
6
AN:
1530
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
30
59
89
118
148
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00330
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00853
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jan 08, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 15, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 09, 2023
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 9 Benign:3
May 17, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 21, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
8.1
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
1.7
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61744561; hg19: chrX-99657669; API