dbSNP rs61745362: CPLANE1:p.Pro375Pro (chr5-37227814-T-C) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-21 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001384732.1(CPLANE1):c.1125A>G(p.Pro375Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 1,549,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 85 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 42 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

CPLANE1
NM_001384732.1 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.376

Variant links:

Genes affected

CPLANE1 (HGNC:25801): (ciliogenesis and planar polarity effector complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene has putative coiled-coil domains and may be a transmembrane protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

CPLANE1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).

BP6

Variant 5-37227814-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37227814-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 158026.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.376 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0135 (2051/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0469 (1950/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0452. There are 42 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 993 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 42 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CPLANE1	NM_001384732.1 link	c.1125A>G	p.Pro375Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 53	ENST00000651892.2	NP_001371661.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CPLANE1	ENST00000651892.2 link	c.1125A>G	p.Pro375Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 53		NM_001384732.1	ENSP00000498265.2		A0A494BZW6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0134

AC:

2038

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0468

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00432

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00959

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00289

AC:

446

AN:

154436

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00233

AC XY:

191

AN XY:

81980

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0496

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00172

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000219

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00161

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00142

AC:

1981

AN:

1396956

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

829

AN XY:

688910

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0505

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000280

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000886

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00318

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0135

AC:

2051

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0133

AC XY:

993

AN XY:

74468

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0469

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00431

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00949

Alfa

AF:

0.00672

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0155

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

May 11, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Joubert syndrome 17

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

7.1

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over