rs61746214
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_030665.4(RAI1):c.3791A>G(p.Glu1264Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,613,466 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030665.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Smith-Magenis syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Potocki-Lupski syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAI1 | NM_030665.4 | c.3791A>G | p.Glu1264Gly | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | ENST00000353383.6 | NP_109590.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAI1 | ENST00000353383.6 | c.3791A>G | p.Glu1264Gly | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 1 | NM_030665.4 | ENSP00000323074.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00657 AC: 999AN: 152152Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00173 AC: 433AN: 250710 AF XY: 0.00120 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000699 AC: 1021AN: 1461196Hom.: 14 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.000600 AC XY: 436AN XY: 726878 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00657 AC: 1000AN: 152270Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00630 AC XY: 469AN XY: 74448 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at