rs61746542

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.5754T>C(p.Thr1918Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.271

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CHARGE syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, ClinGen, G2P
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Kallmann syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Omenn syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 8-60852107-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60852107-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95796.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00156 (238/152354) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00536 (223/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00479. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 122 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	NM_017780.4 link	c.5754T>C	p.Thr1918Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 29 of 38	ENST00000423902.7	NP_060250.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7 link	c.5754T>C	p.Thr1918Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 29 of 38	5	NM_017780.4	ENSP00000392028.1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5 link	c.1717-10122T>C		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 4	1		ENSP00000437061.1
CHD7	ENST00000527921.1 link	n.245T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 5	4
CHD7	ENST00000695853.1 link	n.5754T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 29 of 37			ENSP00000512218.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00153

AC:

233

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00526

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000720

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000386

AC:

AN:

248772

AF XY:

0.000333

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00575

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000216

AC:

315

AN:

1461684

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000198

AC XY:

144

AN XY:

727122

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00729

AC:

244

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53392

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1111856

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000712

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00156

AC:

238

AN:

152354

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00164

AC XY:

122

AN XY:

74508

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00536

AC:

223

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000719

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000883

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00181

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 13, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CHD7: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 25, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 16, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CHARGE syndrome;C3552553:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia

Benign:1

Jul 26, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

7.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.69

PhyloP100

0.27

Mutation Taster

=89/11

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over