rs61746542
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_017780.4(CHD7):āc.5754T>Cā(p.Thr1918Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous
NM_017780.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.271
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 8-60852107-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60852107-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95796.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60852107-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00156 (238/152354) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00536 (223/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00479. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 122 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 238 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | ENST00000423902.7 | c.5754T>C | p.Thr1918Thr | synonymous_variant | 29/38 | 5 | NM_017780.4 | ENSP00000392028.1 | ||
CHD7 | ENST00000524602.5 | c.1717-10122T>C | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000437061.1 | |||||
CHD7 | ENST00000527921.1 | n.245T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/5 | 4 | |||||
CHD7 | ENST00000695853.1 | n.5754T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 29/37 | ENSP00000512218.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00153 AC: 233AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
233
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000386 AC: 96AN: 248772Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000333 AC XY: 45AN XY: 134960
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
96
AN:
248772
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
134960
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000216 AC: 315AN: 1461684Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000198 AC XY: 144AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
315
AN:
1461684
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
727122
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00156 AC: 238AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00164 AC XY: 122AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
238
AN:
152354
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
122
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | CHD7: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 13, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 25, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 16, 2013 | - - |
CHARGE syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 10, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CHARGE syndrome;C3552553:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 26, 2021 | - - |
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at