rs61746642

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BA1

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):​c.1284C>T​(p.Ile428=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00291 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 62 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 53 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.29
Variant links:
Genes affected
P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 1-42754930-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42754930-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 379769.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-42754930-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.29 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0511 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
P3H1NM_022356.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1284C>T p.Ile428= synonymous_variant 8/15 ENST00000296388.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
P3H1ENST00000296388.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1284C>T p.Ile428= synonymous_variant 8/151 NM_022356.4 P1Q32P28-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2240
AN:
152116
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00648
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00813
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00407
AC:
1024
AN:
251460
Hom.:
25
AF XY:
0.00315
AC XY:
428
AN XY:
135902
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000519
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00167
AC:
2447
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
53
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
1051
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0532
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00349
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000249
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00353
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2243
AN:
152234
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0145
AC XY:
1079
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0505
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00641
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00805
Alfa
AF:
0.00678
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.0167
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 10, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenSep 13, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
4.0
DANN
Benign
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61746642; hg19: chr1-43220601; COSMIC: COSV52537101; COSMIC: COSV52537101; API