rs61746642

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BA1

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):​c.1284C>T​(p.Ile428Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00291 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 62 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 53 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.29

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
P3H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 8
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 1-42754930-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42754930-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 379769.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.29 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0511 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
P3H1NM_022356.4 linkc.1284C>T p.Ile428Ile synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 ENST00000296388.10 NP_071751.3 Q32P28-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
P3H1ENST00000296388.10 linkc.1284C>T p.Ile428Ile synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 15 1 NM_022356.4 ENSP00000296388.5 Q32P28-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2240
AN:
152116
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00648
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00813
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00407
AC:
1024
AN:
251460
AF XY:
0.00315
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000519
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00167
AC:
2447
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
53
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
1051
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0532
AC:
1780
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00349
AC:
156
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
16
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000249
AC:
277
AN:
1112000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00353
AC:
213
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
147
293
440
586
733
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
64
128
192
256
320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0147
AC:
2243
AN:
152234
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0145
AC XY:
1079
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0505
AC:
2098
AN:
41522
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00641
AC:
98
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000397
AC:
27
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00805
AC:
17
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
101
202
303
404
505
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00691
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.0167
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:3
Oct 23, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:1
Oct 10, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Sep 13, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
4.0
DANN
Benign
0.85
PhyloP100
-1.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61746642; hg19: chr1-43220601; COSMIC: COSV52537101; COSMIC: COSV52537101; API