rs61746966

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001101426.4(CRPPA):​c.726A>G​(p.Gln242Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00505 in 1,611,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 305 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.027 ( 168 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 137 hom. )

Consequence

CRPPA
NM_001101426.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.02
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRPPA (HGNC:37276): (CDP-L-ribitol pyrophosphorylase A) This gene encodes a 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase-like protein. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Walker-Warburg syndrome. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 7-16308586-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-16308586-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129289.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-16308586-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.02 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.091 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CRPPANM_001101426.4 linkc.726A>G p.Gln242Gln synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000407010.7 NP_001094896.1 A4D126-1
CRPPANM_001101417.4 linkc.576A>G p.Gln192Gln synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 9 NP_001094887.1 A4D126-2A0A140VJM1
CRPPANM_001368197.1 linkc.685-7120A>G intron_variant Intron 3 of 8 NP_001355126.1
CRPPANR_160656.1 linkn.901-30360A>G intron_variant Intron 3 of 7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CRPPAENST00000407010.7 linkc.726A>G p.Gln242Gln synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 5 NM_001101426.4 ENSP00000385478.2 A4D126-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0270
AC:
4107
AN:
152124
Hom.:
165
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0931
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0163
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00704
AC:
1729
AN:
245698
Hom.:
68
AF XY:
0.00529
AC XY:
704
AN XY:
133030
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0968
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00492
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000270
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00484
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00274
AC:
3996
AN:
1458844
Hom.:
137
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
1679
AN XY:
725450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0945
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00503
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00564
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0271
AC:
4133
AN:
152242
Hom.:
168
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0268
AC XY:
1993
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0935
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0161
Alfa
AF:
0.0131
Hom.:
52
Bravo
AF:
0.0311
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A, 7;C5190987:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2U Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Congenital Muscular Dystrophy, alpha-dystroglycan related Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
0.18
DANN
Benign
0.27

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61746966; hg19: chr7-16348211; COSMIC: COSV67906051; API