Menu
GeneBe

rs61746988

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.2025G>A(p.Glu675=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00865 in 1,611,448 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 88 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0078 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0087 ( 79 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.461
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 2-26479541-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26479541-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 21830.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-26479541-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-26479541-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.461 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00874 (12759/1459150) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.017 (98/5764). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0143. There are 79 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 6394 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
OTOFNM_194248.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2025G>A p.Glu675= synonymous_variant 17/47 ENST00000272371.7
OTOFNM_001287489.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2025G>A p.Glu675= synonymous_variant 17/46

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
OTOFENST00000272371.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2025G>A p.Glu675= synonymous_variant 17/471 NM_194248.3 A1Q9HC10-1
OTOFENST00000403946.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2025G>A p.Glu675= synonymous_variant 17/465 P4Q9HC10-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00780
AC:
1187
AN:
152180
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00913
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00793
AC:
1942
AN:
244822
Hom.:
13
AF XY:
0.00781
AC XY:
1039
AN XY:
133104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0112
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00874
AC:
12759
AN:
1459150
Hom.:
79
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00881
AC XY:
6394
AN XY:
725712
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00965
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00778
AC:
1185
AN:
152298
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00826
AC XY:
615
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00913
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.0102
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00667
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 26, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 15, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16371502) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2023OTOF: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 11, 2010- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
Cadd
Benign
1.8
Dann
Benign
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61746988; hg19: chr2-26702409; API