rs61748445
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000554.6(CRX):c.472G>A(p.Ala158Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00475 in 1,613,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 295 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.024 ( 151 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 144 hom. )
Consequence
CRX
NM_000554.6 missense
NM_000554.6 missense
Scores
1
2
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.24
Genes affected
CRX (HGNC:2383): (cone-rod homeobox) The protein encoded by this gene is a photoreceptor-specific transcription factor which plays a role in the differentiation of photoreceptor cells. This homeodomain protein is necessary for the maintenance of normal cone and rod function. Mutations in this gene are associated with photoreceptor degeneration, Leber congenital amaurosis type III and the autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy 2. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants of this gene have been described, but the full-length nature of some variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
PM1
?
In a chain Cone-rod homeobox protein (size 298) in uniprot entity CRX_HUMAN there are 56 pathogenic changes around while only 17 benign (77%) in NM_000554.6
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0023398101).
BP6
?
Variant 19-47839539-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-47839539-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 99608.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0794 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRX | NM_000554.6 | c.472G>A | p.Ala158Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000221996.12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRX | ENST00000221996.12 | c.472G>A | p.Ala158Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | 2 | NM_000554.6 | P1 | |
CRX | ENST00000613299.1 | c.*194G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 3/3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0239 AC: 3628AN: 152012Hom.: 150 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
3628
AN:
152012
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00689 AC: 1720AN: 249576Hom.: 68 AF XY: 0.00499 AC XY: 674AN XY: 135118
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1720
AN:
249576
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
674
AN XY:
135118
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00276 AC: 4033AN: 1461240Hom.: 144 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00241 AC XY: 1751AN XY: 726892
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4033
AN:
1461240
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1751
AN XY:
726892
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0239 AC: 3636AN: 152130Hom.: 151 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0233 AC XY: 1732AN XY: 74384
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
3636
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1732
AN XY:
74384
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
400
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
996
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 13, 2022 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 22, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10766140, 20981092) - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 15, 2014 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa;C3151192:Leber congenital amaurosis 7;C3489532:Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 09, 2021 | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 7;C3489532:Cone-rod dystrophy 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at