rs61749368
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 5P and 5B. PM1PM5PP2BP4_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_000552.5(VWF):c.3692A>G(p.Asn1231Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000761 in 1,612,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1231T) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWF | NM_000552.5 | c.3692A>G | p.Asn1231Ser | missense_variant | 28/52 | ENST00000261405.10 | NP_000543.3 | |
VWF | XM_047429501.1 | c.3692A>G | p.Asn1231Ser | missense_variant | 28/52 | XP_047285457.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWF | ENST00000261405.10 | c.3692A>G | p.Asn1231Ser | missense_variant | 28/52 | 1 | NM_000552.5 | ENSP00000261405.5 | ||
VWF | ENST00000539641.1 | n.490A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 3 | |||||
VWF | ENST00000538635.5 | n.421-25792A>G | intron_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000487 AC: 74AN: 152090Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00144 AC: 350AN: 242782Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00187 AC XY: 247AN XY: 132372
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000789 AC: 1152AN: 1459982Hom.: 10 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00104 AC XY: 756AN XY: 726258
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000493 AC: 75AN: 152208Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000578 AC XY: 43AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 08, 2021 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 10, 2024 | The VWF c.3692A>G (p.Asn1231Ser) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with type 1 (PMIDs: 28971901 (2017)) and type 2 von Willebrand disease (PMID: 23179108 (2013)). Characterization of the variant showed normal VWF synthesis, secretion and multimers with normal functional parameters (PMIDs: 30488424 (2019), 23179108 (2013)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0099 (299/30190 chromosomes in South Asian subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2024 | VWF: BP4, BS1 - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 14, 2024 | Variant summary: VWF c.3692A>G (p.Asn1231Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the von Willebrand factor, VWA N-terminal domain (IPR032361) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 242782 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0099 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in VWF causing Von Willebrand Disease phenotype.c.3692A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Von Willebrand Disease (Type 2/ 1H or mild forms) (examples: Ahmad_2013, Van Der Berg_2014, and Borras_2017, Perez-Rodriguez_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Von Willebrand Disease. One publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results demonstrated normal VWF synthesis, secretion and that variant protein forms normal multimers with the authors speculating either a non-causal outcome or a mild-defect (Ahmed_2013). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 23179108, 28971901, 24954083, 34494337). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 976752). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
von Willebrand disease type 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics Munich, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, TU München | Jan 06, 2025 | - - |
von Willebrand disease type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ISTH-SSC Genomics in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, KU Leuven, Center for Molecular and Vascular Biology | - | - - |
Hereditary von Willebrand disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Sep 10, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at