rs61749398
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PS3PS4_ModeratePP4_ModeratePP3PP1PM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000552.4(VWF):c.3970G>A (p.Gly1324Ser) variant is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of Glycine by Serine at amino acid 1324. At least 1 patient with this variant displayed excessive mucocutaneous bleeding as well as laboratory phenotypes of a normal multimer pattern, low VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, and a decreased GP1b binding assay, which together are highly specific for VWD type 2M (PP4_moderate, PMID:30084138). The variant has been reported to segregate with VWD type 2M through 2 affected meioses from 1 family (PP1; PMID:29341351). At least 3 additional VWD type 2M probands have been reported with this variant (PMIDs: 29341351, 22102201, 1409710; PS4_moderate). The Grpmax filtering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.1 is 0.000003650 (based on 2/91074 alleles in the South Asian population), which is lower than the ClinGen VWD VCEP threshold of <0.0001 (PM2_Supporting). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.718, which is above the ClinGen VWD VCEP threshold of >0.644 and predicts a damaging effect on VWF function (PP3). A platelet binding assay in COS-7 cells expressing recombinant VWF showed decreased binding indicating that this variant has a damaging effect on protein function. In a direct binding assay, the ristocetin-induced binding of rvWF(G1324S) to platelets was markedly reduced compared with rvWF(wt). (PMID:1409710) (PS3). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as Pathogenic for autosomal dominant VWD type 2M based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen VWD VCEP: PS3, PM2_supporting, PP1, PP3, PP4_moderate, PS4_moderate. (VCEP specifications version Pilot; date of approval). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA114147/MONDO:0015630/081
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary von Willebrand diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- von Willebrand disease 2Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- von Willebrand disease type 2BInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- von Willebrand disease type 2AInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease type 2MInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease 3Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease type 2NInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000552.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VWF | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3970G>A | p.Gly1324Ser | missense | Exon 28 of 52 | ENSP00000261405.5 | P04275-1 | ||
| VWF | c.3970G>A | p.Gly1324Ser | missense | Exon 29 of 53 | ENSP00000565738.1 | ||||
| VWF | c.2967+9894G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000565739.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000798 AC: 2AN: 250604 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1461572Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727094 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74324 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at