Menu
GeneBe

rs61749711

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.618C>T(p.Ser206=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00306 in 1,209,931 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. There are 1,176 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., 59 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 4 hom. 1117 hem. )

Consequence

MECP2
NM_001110792.2 synonymous

Scores

2
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0860
Variant links:
Genes affected
MECP2 (HGNC:6990): (methyl-CpG binding protein 2) DNA methylation is the major modification of eukaryotic genomes and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Human proteins MECP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4 comprise a family of nuclear proteins related by the presence in each of a methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD). Each of these proteins, with the exception of MBD3, is capable of binding specifically to methylated DNA. MECP2, MBD1 and MBD2 can also repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. In contrast to other MBD family members, MECP2 is X-linked and subject to X inactivation. MECP2 is dispensible in stem cells, but is essential for embryonic development. MECP2 gene mutations are the cause of most cases of Rett syndrome, a progressive neurologic developmental disorder and one of the most common causes of cognitive disability in females. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008058667).
BP6
Variant X-154031246-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154031246-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95197.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154031246-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-154031246-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-154031246-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.086 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00195 (218/111719) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00309 (164/53010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00271. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 59 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd at 59 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MECP2NM_001110792.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.618C>T p.Ser206= synonymous_variant 3/3 ENST00000453960.7
MECP2NM_004992.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.582C>T p.Ser194= synonymous_variant 4/4 ENST00000303391.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MECP2ENST00000453960.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.618C>T p.Ser206= synonymous_variant 3/31 NM_001110792.2 P51608-2
MECP2ENST00000303391.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.582C>T p.Ser194= synonymous_variant 4/41 NM_004992.4 P1P51608-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00195
AC:
218
AN:
111669
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00174
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
33861
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000686
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00733
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00152
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000564
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000494
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00230
AC:
421
AN:
183308
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00233
AC XY:
158
AN XY:
67812
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000761
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000534
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00225
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000312
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00243
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00317
AC:
3484
AN:
1098212
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00307
AC XY:
1117
AN XY:
363574
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000682
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00304
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000619
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000518
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00271
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00195
AC:
218
AN:
111719
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00174
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
33923
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000684
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00152
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000565
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000494
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00229
Hom.:
18
Bravo
AF:
0.00187
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00450
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00342
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
0.00222
AC:
270
EpiCase
AF:
0.00305
EpiControl
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 09, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedcurationRettBASEDec 05, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 15, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationCentre for Population Genomics, CPGMar 22, 2024This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria. Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 3.0, this variant is classified as benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 3.0 (BA1). -
History of neurodevelopmental disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 01, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
MECP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 09, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.71
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
Cadd
Benign
0.88
Dann
Benign
0.52
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.075
T;T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.43
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0081
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.49
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;N
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.052
T;T
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.98
ClinPred
0.0073
T
GERP RS
-4.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61749711; hg19: chrX-153296697; API