rs61749712
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.621C>T(p.Gly207=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000108 in 1,209,993 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 70 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G207G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | NM_001110792.2 | c.621C>T | p.Gly207= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000453960.7 | |
MECP2 | NM_004992.4 | c.585C>T | p.Gly195= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000303391.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | ENST00000453960.7 | c.621C>T | p.Gly207= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001110792.2 | ||
MECP2 | ENST00000303391.11 | c.585C>T | p.Gly195= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004992.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000537 AC: 6AN: 111689Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 33881
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000169 AC: 31AN: 183365Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000280 AC XY: 19AN XY: 67847
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000114 AC: 125AN: 1098250Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000193 AC XY: 70AN XY: 363610
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000537 AC: 6AN: 111743Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 33945
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 06, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | RettBASE | Feb 03, 2006 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 09, 2023 | - - |
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Centre for Population Genomics, CPG | Mar 20, 2024 | This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria. Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 3.0, this variant is classified as benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD V4 is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 3.0 (BA1). - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 03, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
MECP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 10, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at