rs61749896
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.788G>A(p.Arg263Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000673 in 1,614,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.788G>A | p.Arg263Gln | missense_variant | 7/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.2150G>A | p.Arg717Gln | missense_variant | 15/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.788G>A | p.Arg263Gln | missense_variant | 7/15 | NM_000123.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000593 AC: 149AN: 251382Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000493 AC XY: 67AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000683 AC: 998AN: 1461850Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000622 AC XY: 452AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000471 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74330
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 01, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in the germline or tumor of an individual with BAP1-associated tumor predisposition syndrome and in healthy individuals undergoing whole exome sequencing (Bodian 2014, Bochtler 2018, Pritchard 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29891518, 24728327, 29641532) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Sep 20, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | ERCC5: BP4 - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Nov 04, 2018 | This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 11, 2020 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at