Menu
GeneBe

rs61751223

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000883.4(IMPDH1):c.1142A>G(p.His381Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00334 in 1,613,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H381Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

IMPDH1
NM_000883.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.05
Variant links:
Genes affected
IMPDH1 (HGNC:6052): (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1) The protein encoded by this gene acts as a homotetramer to regulate cell growth. The encoded protein is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of xanthine monophosphate (XMP) from inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP). This is the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. Defects in this gene are a cause of retinitis pigmentosa type 10 (RP10). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01203832).
BP6
Variant 7-128396955-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-128396955-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 707014.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr7-128396955-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00212 (322/151904) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0035 (238/67932). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00314. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 161 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 322 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
IMPDH1NM_000883.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1142A>G p.His381Arg missense_variant 11/17 ENST00000338791.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
IMPDH1ENST00000338791.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1142A>G p.His381Arg missense_variant 11/172 NM_000883.4 P20839-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00212
AC:
322
AN:
151788
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000702
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00216
AC:
542
AN:
251250
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00236
AC XY:
320
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000983
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000601
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00347
AC:
5065
AN:
1461096
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00337
AC XY:
2452
AN XY:
726908
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00415
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00333
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00212
AC:
322
AN:
151904
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00217
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
74246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000700
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00190
Alfa
AF:
0.00286
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00228
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00270
AC:
10
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00519
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00267
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
0.00228
AC:
277
EpiCase
AF:
0.00414
EpiControl
AF:
0.00433

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 11 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Uncertain
0.97
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
T;T;T;T;T;T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.86
N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T;T;T;.;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.094
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0, 0.0010
.;.;B;.;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.65
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
3.9
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61751223; hg19: chr7-128037009; API