rs61751489

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):​c.6853G>A​(p.Val2285Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0188 in 1,612,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 902 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 83 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.019 ( 819 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.506

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
NOTCH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Adams-Oliver syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, Orphanet
  • Adams-Oliver syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • aortic valve disease 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • connective tissue disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • leukodystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • familial bicuspid aortic valve
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016611814).
BP6
Variant 9-136496886-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136496886-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 134954.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0898 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NOTCH1NM_017617.5 linkc.6853G>A p.Val2285Ile missense_variant Exon 34 of 34 ENST00000651671.1 NP_060087.3 P46531
NOTCH1XM_011518717.3 linkc.6130G>A p.Val2044Ile missense_variant Exon 31 of 31 XP_011517019.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NOTCH1ENST00000651671.1 linkc.6853G>A p.Val2285Ile missense_variant Exon 34 of 34 NM_017617.5 ENSP00000498587.1 P46531

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0186
AC:
2832
AN:
152208
Hom.:
81
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00528
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0933
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00499
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0312
AC:
7684
AN:
246434
AF XY:
0.0254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00513
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00659
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0188
AC:
27529
AN:
1460488
Hom.:
819
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0180
AC XY:
13058
AN XY:
726554
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00394
AC:
132
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.153
AC:
6841
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00444
AC:
116
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00536
AC:
462
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00721
AC:
376
AN:
52168
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00488
AC:
28
AN:
5732
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
18525
AN:
1111964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0173
AC:
1046
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2043
4087
6130
8174
10217
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
790
1580
2370
3160
3950
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0187
AC:
2841
AN:
152326
Hom.:
83
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0189
AC XY:
1411
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00527
AC:
219
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0938
AC:
1436
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
17
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
23
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00499
AC:
53
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0155
AC:
1054
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0175
AC:
37
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
146
291
437
582
728
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0167
Hom.:
34
Bravo
AF:
0.0260
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0165
AC:
61
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0215
AC:
83
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00489
AC:
20
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0162
AC:
135
ExAC
AF:
0.0247
AC:
2983
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00751
AC:
26
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0145
EpiControl
AF:
0.0142

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Apr 10, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 29, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 04, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 27, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Adams-Oliver syndrome 5 Benign:2
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome Uncertain:1
-
University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, University of Washington
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Feb 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aortic valve disease 1 Benign:1
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.67
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.70
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.53
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.11
N
PhyloP100
0.51
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.070
N
REVEL
Benign
0.079
Sift
Benign
0.52
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.62
T
Polyphen
0.0040
B
Vest4
0.025
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.0013
T
GERP RS
2.7
Varity_R
0.025
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61751489; hg19: chr9-139391338; API