rs61752387

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BS2BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The allele frequency of the c.1126C>T, p.(Pro376Ser) variant in MECP2(NM_004992.4) is 0.13% in European (Non-Finnish) sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BA1). The p.(Pro376Ser) variant is observed in at least 2 unaffected individuals (PMID 10944854, PMID 14560307, RettBASE) (BS1). In summary, the p.(Pro376Ser) variant in MECP2 is classified as Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied (BA1, BS2). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA148292/MONDO:0010726/016

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., 24 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 0 hom. 537 hem. )

Consequence

MECP2
NM_001110792.2 missense

Scores

1
3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.76
Variant links:
Genes affected
MECP2 (HGNC:6990): (methyl-CpG binding protein 2) DNA methylation is the major modification of eukaryotic genomes and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Human proteins MECP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4 comprise a family of nuclear proteins related by the presence in each of a methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD). Each of these proteins, with the exception of MBD3, is capable of binding specifically to methylated DNA. MECP2, MBD1 and MBD2 can also repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. In contrast to other MBD family members, MECP2 is X-linked and subject to X inactivation. MECP2 is dispensible in stem cells, but is essential for embryonic development. MECP2 gene mutations are the cause of most cases of Rett syndrome, a progressive neurologic developmental disorder and one of the most common causes of cognitive disability in females. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MECP2NM_001110792.2 linkc.1162C>T p.Pro388Ser missense_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000453960.7 NP_001104262.1 P51608-2A0A140VKC4Q59FJ6
MECP2NM_004992.4 linkc.1126C>T p.Pro376Ser missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000303391.11 NP_004983.1 P51608-1D3YJ43Q59FJ6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MECP2ENST00000453960.7 linkc.1162C>T p.Pro388Ser missense_variant Exon 3 of 3 1 NM_001110792.2 ENSP00000395535.2 P51608-2
MECP2ENST00000303391.11 linkc.1126C>T p.Pro376Ser missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_004992.4 ENSP00000301948.6 P51608-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
112
AN:
109987
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.000745
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
32209
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000596
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000335
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000998
AC:
176
AN:
176306
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000976
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
63496
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000495
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000813
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00115
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00152
AC:
1661
AN:
1094648
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00149
AC XY:
537
AN XY:
360858
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000855
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000148
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000609
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00102
AC:
112
AN:
110036
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.000744
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
32268
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000595
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000335
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00157
Hom.:
58
Bravo
AF:
0.000929
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00138
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00107
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00152
AC:
10
ExAC
AF:
0.000776
AC:
94

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 12, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 18, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 22, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 16, 2015
Molecular Diagnostics Lab, Nemours Children's Health, Delaware
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 14, 2010
RettBASE
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 18, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Rett syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jul 06, 2023
Centre for Population Genomics, CPG
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0 , this variant is classified as Benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1). -

May 31, 2018
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

This variant is interpreted as a Benign, for Rett syndrome, in X-linked Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. BS4 => Lack of segregation in affected members of a family (PMID:12567420) (PMID:12161600). BP4 => Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). -

Apr 28, 2022
ClinGen Rett and Angelman-like Disorders Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance: Benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

The allele frequency of the c.1126C>T, p.(Pro376Ser) variant in MECP2 (NM_004992.4) is 0.13% in European (Non-Finnish) sub population in gnomAD, which is high enough to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like conditions (BA1). The p.(Pro376Ser) variant is observed in at least 2 unaffected individuals (PMID 10944854, PMID 14560307, RettBASE) (BS1). In summary, the p.(Pro376Ser) variant in MECP2 is classified as Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied (BA1, BS2). -

Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jun 12, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.27
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.72
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T;.
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.77
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.42
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.63
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.070
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Benign
0.20
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.073
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.063
MVP
0.76
ClinPred
0.00039
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.042
gMVP
0.30

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61752387; hg19: chrX-153296153; COSMIC: COSV99066745; COSMIC: COSV99066745; API