Menu
GeneBe

rs61752962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_002764.4(PRPS1):c.477C>T(p.Ile159=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00918 in 1,209,773 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. There are 3,793 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0062 ( 3 hom., 174 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0095 ( 42 hom. 3619 hem. )

Consequence

PRPS1
NM_002764.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.95
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRPS1 (HGNC:9462): (phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the phosphoribosylation of ribose 5-phosphate to 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate, which is necessary for purine metabolism and nucleotide biosynthesis. Defects in this gene are a cause of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease X-linked recessive type 5 and Arts Syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).
BP6
Variant X-107642437-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-107642437-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 94083.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-107642437-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-107642437-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.95 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 3 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PRPS1NM_002764.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.477C>T p.Ile159= synonymous_variant 4/7 ENST00000372435.10
PRPS1NM_001204402.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-82-2740C>T intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PRPS1ENST00000372435.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.477C>T p.Ile159= synonymous_variant 4/71 NM_002764.4 P1P60891-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00617
AC:
690
AN:
111845
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00506
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
34019
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00642
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0113
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00746
AC:
1368
AN:
183465
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00872
AC XY:
592
AN XY:
67919
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00561
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00773
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00949
AC:
10417
AN:
1097876
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00996
AC XY:
3619
AN XY:
363242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000833
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00568
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000331
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00848
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00617
AC:
690
AN:
111897
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00511
AC XY:
174
AN XY:
34081
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00642
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0111
Alfa
AF:
0.00895
Hom.:
77
Bravo
AF:
0.00555
EpiCase
AF:
0.0100
EpiControl
AF:
0.0117

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Ile159Ile in Exon 04 of PRPS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.8% (42/5545) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61752962). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 19, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 18, 2023- -
Hearing loss, X-linked 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Arts syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy X Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease X-linked recessive 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Arts syndrome;C1839566:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease X-linked recessive 5;C1844677:Hearing loss, X-linked 1;C1970827:Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsJul 21, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
Cadd
Benign
8.5
Dann
Benign
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61752962; hg19: chrX-106885667; COSMIC: COSV65054155; COSMIC: COSV65054155; API