rs61753012

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):​c.1233C>T​(p.Pro411=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0009 in 1,201,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 335 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., 23 hem., cov: 20)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 ( 0 hom. 312 hem. )

Consequence

MECP2
NM_001110792.2 synonymous

Scores

8

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.44
Variant links:
Genes affected
MECP2 (HGNC:6990): (methyl-CpG binding protein 2) DNA methylation is the major modification of eukaryotic genomes and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Human proteins MECP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4 comprise a family of nuclear proteins related by the presence in each of a methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD). Each of these proteins, with the exception of MBD3, is capable of binding specifically to methylated DNA. MECP2, MBD1 and MBD2 can also repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. In contrast to other MBD family members, MECP2 is X-linked and subject to X inactivation. MECP2 is dispensible in stem cells, but is essential for embryonic development. MECP2 gene mutations are the cause of most cases of Rett syndrome, a progressive neurologic developmental disorder and one of the most common causes of cognitive disability in females. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014400035).
BP6
Variant X-154030631-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95188.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000813 (88/108291) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00143 (74/51756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00117. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 23 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 20. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MECP2NM_001110792.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1233C>T p.Pro411= synonymous_variant 3/3 ENST00000453960.7 NP_001104262.1
MECP2NM_004992.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1197C>T p.Pro399= synonymous_variant 4/4 ENST00000303391.11 NP_004983.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MECP2ENST00000453960.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1233C>T p.Pro411= synonymous_variant 3/31 NM_001110792.2 ENSP00000395535 P51608-2
MECP2ENST00000303391.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1197C>T p.Pro399= synonymous_variant 4/41 NM_004992.4 ENSP00000301948 P1P51608-1
MECP2ENST00000407218.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*569C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 4/45 ENSP00000384865
MECP2ENST00000628176.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*569C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 5/53 ENSP00000486978

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000813
AC:
88
AN:
108242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
20
AF XY:
0.000752
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
30580
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000490
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00422
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00140
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000909
AC:
160
AN:
176063
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000823
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
64399
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00226
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000909
AC:
994
AN:
1093493
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000865
AC XY:
312
AN XY:
360841
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000227
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000516
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000761
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000813
AC:
88
AN:
108291
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
20
AF XY:
0.000751
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
30639
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000489
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00138
Alfa
AF:
0.00128
Hom.:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000748
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000916
AC:
111
EpiCase
AF:
0.000927
EpiControl
AF:
0.00190

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 10, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 12, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedcurationRettBASEDec 05, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 07, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationCentre for Population Genomics, CPGAug 14, 2023This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0, this variant is classified as benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1). Synonymous or intronic variant outside donor and acceptor splice regions where splicing prediction algorithms do not support significant splicing alteration (spliceAI score <=0.1) (BP4, BP7). -
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
History of neurodevelopmental disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 29, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
3.0
DANN
Benign
0.52
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.065
T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.35
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.86
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.65
D;D
GERP RS
0.92
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61753012; hg19: chrX-153296082; COSMIC: COSV57655197; COSMIC: COSV57655197; API