rs61753012
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.1233C>T(p.Pro411=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0009 in 1,201,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 335 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., 23 hem., cov: 20)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 ( 0 hom. 312 hem. )
Consequence
MECP2
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
Scores
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.44
Genes affected
MECP2 (HGNC:6990): (methyl-CpG binding protein 2) DNA methylation is the major modification of eukaryotic genomes and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Human proteins MECP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4 comprise a family of nuclear proteins related by the presence in each of a methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD). Each of these proteins, with the exception of MBD3, is capable of binding specifically to methylated DNA. MECP2, MBD1 and MBD2 can also repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. In contrast to other MBD family members, MECP2 is X-linked and subject to X inactivation. MECP2 is dispensible in stem cells, but is essential for embryonic development. MECP2 gene mutations are the cause of most cases of Rett syndrome, a progressive neurologic developmental disorder and one of the most common causes of cognitive disability in females. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014400035).
BP6
Variant X-154030631-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95188.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-154030631-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000813 (88/108291) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00143 (74/51756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00117. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 23 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 20. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | NM_001110792.2 | c.1233C>T | p.Pro411= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000453960.7 | NP_001104262.1 | |
MECP2 | NM_004992.4 | c.1197C>T | p.Pro399= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000303391.11 | NP_004983.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | ENST00000453960.7 | c.1233C>T | p.Pro411= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001110792.2 | ENSP00000395535 | ||
MECP2 | ENST00000303391.11 | c.1197C>T | p.Pro399= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004992.4 | ENSP00000301948 | P1 | |
MECP2 | ENST00000407218.5 | c.*569C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | 5 | ENSP00000384865 | ||||
MECP2 | ENST00000628176.2 | c.*569C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | 3 | ENSP00000486978 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000813 AC: 88AN: 108242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 20 AF XY: 0.000752 AC XY: 23AN XY: 30580
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
88
AN:
108242
Hom.:
Cov.:
20
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
30580
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000909 AC: 160AN: 176063Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000823 AC XY: 53AN XY: 64399
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
160
AN:
176063
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
64399
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000909 AC: 994AN: 1093493Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000865 AC XY: 312AN XY: 360841
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
994
AN:
1093493
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
312
AN XY:
360841
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000813 AC: 88AN: 108291Hom.: 0 Cov.: 20 AF XY: 0.000751 AC XY: 23AN XY: 30639
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
88
AN:
108291
Hom.:
Cov.:
20
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
30639
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
111
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | RettBASE | Dec 05, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 07, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Rett syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Centre for Population Genomics, CPG | Aug 14, 2023 | This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0, this variant is classified as benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1). Synonymous or intronic variant outside donor and acceptor splice regions where splicing prediction algorithms do not support significant splicing alteration (spliceAI score <=0.1) (BP4, BP7). - |
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
History of neurodevelopmental disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 29, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at