rs61753399

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.6478G>A(p.Ala2160Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000772 in 1,613,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.19

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0027823448).

BP6

Variant 8-60853203-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60853203-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 158311.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60853203-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00441 (671/152248) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0156 (650/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0147. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 296 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 671 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	NM_017780.4 link	c.6478G>A	p.Ala2160Thr	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 38	ENST00000423902.7	NP_060250.2	Q9P2D1-1Q6ZWF9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7 link	c.6478G>A	p.Ala2160Thr	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 38	5	NM_017780.4	ENSP00000392028.1	Q9P2D1-1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5 link	c.1717-9026G>A		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 4	1		ENSP00000437061.1	Q9P2D1-4
CHD7	ENST00000695853.1 link	n.6478G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 31 of 37			ENSP00000512218.1	A0A8Q3WKT9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00442

AC:

672

AN:

152130

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0157

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000786

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00105

AC:

262

AN:

248656

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000689

AC XY:

AN XY:

134940

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0147

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000812

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000444

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000497

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000393

AC:

575

AN:

1461608

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000319

AC XY:

232

AN XY:

727084

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0132

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000716

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000261

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00106

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00441

AC:

671

AN:

152248

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00398

AC XY:

296

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0156

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.000774

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00484

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0125

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00128

AC:

154

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:8

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ala2160Thr in exon 31 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 1.47% (140/9514) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs61753399). -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 25, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 22, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:2

May 31, 2018

SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

This variant is interpreted as a Likely Benign, for CHARGE syndrome, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. BP4 => Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 01, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.061

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.59

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

3.6

DANN

Benign

0.15

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.048

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.29

LIST_S2

Benign

0.66

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0028

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

0.15

REVEL

Benign

0.065

Sift

Benign

0.97

Sift4G

Benign

0.60

Polyphen

0.0020

Vest4

0.032

MVP

0.34

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.0020

GERP RS

1.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.014

gMVP

0.25

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over