rs61754138

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.7626G>A​(p.Thr2542=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000434 in 1,611,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T2542T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.50
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.29).
BP6
Variant 13-32357750-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32357750-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52372.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32357750-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.5 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00214 (326/152158) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00722 (300/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00655. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 155 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7626G>A p.Thr2542= synonymous_variant 16/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.7626G>A p.Thr2542= synonymous_variant 16/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00214
AC:
325
AN:
152040
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00722
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000582
AC:
146
AN:
250786
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000457
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
135608
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00731
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000655
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000256
AC:
374
AN:
1459500
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000251
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
726192
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000582
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000342
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000414
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00214
AC:
326
AN:
152158
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00208
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
74388
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000903
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00246
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:23
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Thr2542Thr variant was identified in 4 of 4500 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals with breast and ovarian cancer (Borg 2010, Morgan 2010, Salazar 2006); however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. Myriad classified the variant as a polymorphism (personal communication).The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61754138) “With Likely Benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.0042(21 of 5000 chromosomes in 1000 Genomes Project). In NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), the variant was found in 27 of 4406 African American chromosomes and was not found in European American chromosomes, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. This variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database, released Oct 20th, 2014) in 88 of 120570 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0007299) (or 76 of 10004 African individuals, 8 of 11522 of Latino, 4 of 66482of European (Finnish) chromosomes). The p.Thr2542Thr variant was identified in the ClinVar database (classified as a benign variant by ENIGMA, by Invitae, by GeneDx, Emory Genetics and as a likely benign by Counsyl and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by BIC. In Clinvitae the variant was also identified by EmyClass as benign. BRCA share UMD database identified the variant as likely neutral 16X and co-occurred with BRCA2 pathogenic variants (c.8414_8416delinsC and c.IVS15-2A>T (c.7618-2A>T)) and BRCA1 pathogenic variants (c.211A>G (p.Arg71Gly) and c.IVS16+6T>C (c.4986+6T>C)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Thr2542Thr variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in BIC database 2X with no clinical importance. The p.Thr2542Thr variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 11, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 30, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 27, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 24, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 22, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 14, 2017- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Dec 17, 2010- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.02033 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 22, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 02, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 17, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 24, 2021- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 21, 2022- -
Fanconi anemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61754138; hg19: chr13-32931887; API