rs61754795
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000265433.8(NBN):c.381T>C(p.Ala127=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00448 in 1,612,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0027 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0047 ( 29 hom. )
Consequence
NBN
ENST00000265433.8 synonymous
ENST00000265433.8 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.43
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 8-89980833-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89980833-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132744.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-89980833-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.43 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00274 (418/152320) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00559 (27/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00394. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 202 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 29 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.381T>C | p.Ala127= | synonymous_variant | 4/16 | ENST00000265433.8 | NP_002476.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.381T>C | p.Ala127= | synonymous_variant | 4/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | ENSP00000265433 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00275 AC: 419AN: 152202Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
419
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00317 AC: 797AN: 251186Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00368 AC XY: 500AN XY: 135764
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
797
AN:
251186
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
500
AN XY:
135764
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00466 AC: 6811AN: 1460340Hom.: 29 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00474 AC XY: 3443AN XY: 726602
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6811
AN:
1460340
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
3443
AN XY:
726602
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00274 AC: 418AN: 152320Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00271 AC XY: 202AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
418
AN:
152320
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NBN p.Ala127Ala variant was identified in 1 of 194 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from French Canadian individuals or families non BRCA1/2 breast cancer and was not identified in 144 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Desjardins 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61754795) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, EGL Genetic Diagnostics (Eurofins Clinical Diagnsotics), Color Genomics Inc, Invitae; likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Lab for Molecular Medicine (Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine); and classification not provided by Harris Lab (U of Minnesota)), Clinvitae (4x), and was not identified in Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 858 (4 homozygous) of 276910 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), being identified in the following populations: African in 26 of 24026 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), Other in 16 of 6456 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002), Latino in 54 of 34414 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002), European Non-Finnish in 499 of 126588 chromosomes (frequency: 0.004), European Finnish in 20 of 25630 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0008), Ashkenazi Jewish in 4 of 10150 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004), and South Asian in 239 (4 homozygotes) of 30782 chromosomes (frequency: 0.008). The p.Ala127= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 24, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 15, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | NBN: BP4, BS2 - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Harris Lab, University of Minnesota | - | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 27, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 24, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Multiple assertions in clinvar as benign for hereditary cancer predisposing syndrome and microcephaly with normal intelligence and immunodeficiency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 27, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 21, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 23, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 27, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 01, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Dec 23, 2021 | - - |
Acute lymphoid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at