rs61755280
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.1641T>C(p.Pro547Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000608 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005188.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- CBL-related disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- juvenile myelomonocytic leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBL | NM_005188.4 | c.1641T>C | p.Pro547Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 11 of 16 | ENST00000264033.6 | NP_005179.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000750 AC: 114AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000803 AC: 202AN: 251434 AF XY: 0.000780 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000593 AC: 867AN: 1461890Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000604 AC XY: 439AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000750 AC: 114AN: 152096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000794 AC XY: 59AN XY: 74348 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
- -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
p.Pro547Pro in Exon 11 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (12/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61755280). -
not provided Benign:3
- -
CBL: BP4, BP7 -
- -
CBL-related disorder Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
RASopathy Benign:1
- -
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at