rs61755280

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005188.4(CBL):​c.1641T>C​(p.Pro547Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000608 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00075 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00059 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CBL
NM_005188.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.726

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CBL (HGNC:1541): (Cbl proto-oncogene) This gene is a proto-oncogene that encodes a RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein is one of the enzymes required for targeting substrates for degradation by the proteasome. This protein mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) to specific substrates. This protein also contains an N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that allows it to interact with numerous tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates and target them for proteasome degradation. As such it functions as a negative regulator of many signal transduction pathways. This gene has been found to be mutated or translocated in many cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia, and expansion of CGG repeats in the 5' UTR has been associated with Jacobsen syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also the cause of Noonan syndrome-like disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
CBL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CBL-related disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 11-119285266-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119285266-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45202.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.726 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00075 (114/152096) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00151 (23/15268). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00103. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 59 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 114 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CBLNM_005188.4 linkc.1641T>C p.Pro547Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 16 ENST00000264033.6 NP_005179.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CBLENST00000264033.6 linkc.1641T>C p.Pro547Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 16 1 NM_005188.4 ENSP00000264033.3 P22681

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000750
AC:
114
AN:
151978
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000946
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000500
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000803
AC:
202
AN:
251434
AF XY:
0.000780
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000730
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000593
AC:
867
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000604
AC XY:
439
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00179
AC:
60
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
64
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
53
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
18
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00416
AC:
24
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000522
AC:
581
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00109
AC:
66
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000750
AC:
114
AN:
152096
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000794
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
48
AN:
41480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00151
AC:
23
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000946
AC:
1
AN:
10576
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000500
AC:
34
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000475
AC:
1
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000915
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000952
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Apr 20, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 17, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro547Pro in Exon 11 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.2% (12/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61755280). -

not provided Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CBL: BP4, BP7 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

CBL-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 12, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RASopathy Benign:1
Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Apr 10, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
9.8
DANN
Benign
0.71
PhyloP100
0.73
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61755280; hg19: chr11-119155976; COSMIC: COSV50652070; COSMIC: COSV50652070; API