rs61756328
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.463G>A(p.Ala155Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00309 in 1,612,584 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A155A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.463G>A | p.Ala155Thr | missense_variant | 2/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | NP_004272.2 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.463G>A | p.Ala155Thr | missense_variant | 2/4 | XP_005270344.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.463G>A | p.Ala155Thr | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | ENSP00000358081 | P1 | |
BAG3 | ENST00000450186.1 | c.289G>A | p.Ala97Thr | missense_variant | 3/5 | 5 | ENSP00000410036 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00241 AC: 366AN: 152162Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00291 AC: 719AN: 247498Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00290 AC XY: 390AN XY: 134438
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00316 AC: 4619AN: 1460304Hom.: 19 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00316 AC XY: 2292AN XY: 726360
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00240 AC: 365AN: 152280Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00220 AC XY: 164AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 23, 2017 | p.Ala155Thr in exon 2 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of no te, wallaby, opossum, and platypus have a threonine (Thr) at this position despi te high nearby amino acid conservation. Computational analyses (AlignGVGD, PolyP hen2, SIFT) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In additi on, it has been identified in 0.5% (294/63478) of European (Non-Finnish) chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.orgdb SNP; rs61756328). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 28, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Jan 27, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 16, 2017 | Variant summary: The BAG3 c.463G>A (p.Ala155Thr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 352/117428 control chromosomes (4 homozygotes) from ExAC and literature at a frequency of 0.0029976, which is approximately 77 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BAG3 variant (0.0000391), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases in ClinVar classified this variant as benign/likely benign. It is also regarded as benign in the literature (Ng_2013). To our knowledge, this variant t has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | BAG3: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 06, 2023 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Jun 15, 2018 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 01, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at