rs61756401

chr15-89329018-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_002693.3(POLG):c.948G>A(p.Lys316=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00209 in 1,613,456 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 36 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0027 (8 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 (28 hom.)
• Consequence: POLG NM_002693.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.81

Genes affected

POLG (HGNC:9179): (DNA polymerase gamma, catalytic subunit) Mitochondrial DNA polymerase is heterotrimeric, consisting of a homodimer of accessory subunits plus a catalytic subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is the catalytic subunit of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. The encoded protein contains a polyglutamine tract near its N-terminus that may be polymorphic. Defects in this gene are a cause of progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 (PEOA1), sensory ataxic neuropathy dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis (SANDO), Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome (AHS), and mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome (MNGIE). Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

POLGARF (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
• BP6: Variant 15-89329018-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89329018-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129999.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89329018-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr15-89329018-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.81 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00272 (415/152346) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0148 (77/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0122. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 276 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
POLG	NM_002693.3	c.948G>A	p.Lys316=	synonymous_variant	4/23	ENST00000268124.11
POLGARF	NM_001406557.1	c.*220G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	4/23
POLG	NM_001126131.2	c.948G>A	p.Lys316=	synonymous_variant	4/23

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
POLG	ENST00000268124.11	c.948G>A	p.Lys316=	synonymous_variant	4/23	1	NM_002693.3	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00273 AC: 416 AN: 152228 Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000724

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00150

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.000576

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.0148

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00434

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0232

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000573

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00421 AC: 1050 AN: 249356 Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00426 AC XY: 574 AN XY: 134842

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000492

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00120

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0138

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00484

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0240

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000724

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00311

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00203 AC: 2963 AN: 1461110 Hom.: 28 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00215 AC XY: 1563 AN XY: 726830

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000329

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000514

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00122

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0144

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00535

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0240

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000341

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00235

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00272 AC: 415 AN: 152346 Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00371 AC XY: 276 AN XY: 74490

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000721

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00150

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.000576

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.0148

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00435

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0232

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000573

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.000826 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00119

Asia WGS AF: 0.00577 AC: 20 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000545

EpiControl AF: 0.00101

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 04, 2013	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	-	Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Jun 17, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Mar 28, 2016	Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: High allele frequency -

not provided Benign:5

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jan 01, 2024	POLG: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Jun 30, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Jan 11, 2017	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -

Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Wong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine	Oct 01, 2018	The NM_002693.2:c.948G>A (NP_002684.1:p.Lys316=) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89329018C>T] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Benign based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BS1:The minor allele frequency of this allele is high for Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). BS2:Observation of the variant in controls is inconsistent with penetrance of Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4A (Alpers type). Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 31, 2024	- -

POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 23, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Feb 01, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.36
Cadd	Benign	8.7
Dann	Benign	0.66

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61756401; hg19: chr15-89872249; COSMIC: COSV104390411; COSMIC: COSV104390411;