rs61757672

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_005751.5(AKAP9):​c.7275G>A​(p.Gln2425Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00476 in 1,614,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0050 ( 28 hom. )

Consequence

AKAP9
NM_005751.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.108

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AKAP9 (HGNC:379): (A-kinase anchoring protein 9) The A-kinase anchor proteins (AKAPs) are a group of structurally diverse proteins which have the common function of binding to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) and confining the holoenzyme to discrete locations within the cell. This gene encodes a member of the AKAP family. Alternate splicing of this gene results in at least two isoforms that localize to the centrosome and the Golgi apparatus, and interact with numerous signaling proteins from multiple signal transduction pathways. These signaling proteins include type II protein kinase A, serine/threonine kinase protein kinase N, protein phosphatase 1, protein phosphatase 2a, protein kinase C-epsilon and phosphodiesterase 4D3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
AKAP9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • male infertility with azoospermia or oligozoospermia due to single gene mutation
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
  • long QT syndrome 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 7-92079408-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-92079408-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136337.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.108 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 28 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AKAP9NM_005751.5 linkc.7275G>A p.Gln2425Gln synonymous_variant Exon 31 of 50 ENST00000356239.8 NP_005742.4 Q99996-2Q6PJH3Q5GIA7
AKAP9NM_147185.3 linkc.7251G>A p.Gln2417Gln synonymous_variant Exon 31 of 50 NP_671714.1 Q99996-3Q6PJH3Q5GIA7
AKAP9NM_001379277.1 linkc.1920G>A p.Gln640Gln synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 29 NP_001366206.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AKAP9ENST00000356239.8 linkc.7275G>A p.Gln2425Gln synonymous_variant Exon 31 of 50 1 NM_005751.5 ENSP00000348573.3 Q99996-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00292
AC:
445
AN:
152186
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00460
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00300
AC:
751
AN:
250514
AF XY:
0.00304
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000998
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00627
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00540
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00496
AC:
7244
AN:
1461716
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00479
AC XY:
3485
AN XY:
727140
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000777
AC:
26
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
52
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00624
AC:
163
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39652
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
172
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
148
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000694
AC:
4
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00575
AC:
6395
AN:
1111954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00469
AC:
283
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
418
836
1254
1672
2090
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
258
516
774
1032
1290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00292
AC:
444
AN:
152304
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00250
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000914
AC:
38
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00268
AC:
41
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00461
AC:
16
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
25
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00460
AC:
313
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
49
73
98
122
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00423
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00293
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00393
EpiControl
AF:
0.00385

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Jul 11, 2011
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

AKAP9: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Long QT syndrome 11 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Sep 15, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.37
PhyloP100
0.11
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61757672; hg19: chr7-91708722; COSMIC: COSV62343634; COSMIC: COSV62343634; API