rs61759494

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001006658.3(CR2):c.624C>A(p.Pro208Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00253 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P208P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

CR2
NM_001006658.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.81

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CR2 (HGNC:2336): (complement C3d receptor 2) This gene encodes a membrane protein, which functions as a receptor for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) binding on B and T lymphocytes. Genetic variations in this gene are associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus type 9 (SLEB9). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

CR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

immunodeficiency, common variable, 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
common variable immunodeficiency
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
systemic lupus erythematosus
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).

BP6

Variant 1-207468705-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-207468705-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 473101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.82 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00163 (248/152252) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00226 (154/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00197. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 109 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 Unknown,AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CR2	NM_001006658.3 link	c.624C>A	p.Pro208Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 20	ENST00000367057.8	NP_001006659.1
CR2	NM_001877.5 link	c.624C>A	p.Pro208Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 19		NP_001868.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CR2	ENST00000367057.8 link	c.624C>A	p.Pro208Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 20	1	NM_001006658.3	ENSP00000356024.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00163

AC:

248

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000531

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00228

AC:

573

AN:

251408

AF XY:

0.00225

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0156

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00261

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00263

AC:

3839

AN:

1461734

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00257

AC XY:

1871

AN XY:

727166

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000418

AC:

AN:

33458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00101

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0156

AC:

408

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00155

AC:

134

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000749

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00329

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00272

AC:

3021

AN:

1111910

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00321

AC:

194

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

234

467

701

934

1168

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

124

248

372

496

620

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00163

AC:

248

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00146

AC XY:

109

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000529

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00118

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0133

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000622

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00226

AC:

154

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00237

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00243

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00188

EpiCase

AF:

0.00311

EpiControl

AF:

0.00433

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CR2: BP4, BP7

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 09, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Immunodeficiency, common variable, 7

Benign:2

Apr 11, 2023

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CR2-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 02, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.74

CADD

Benign

0.66

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.50

PhyloP100

-2.8

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over