rs61760172

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001379180.1(ESRRB):​c.206C>T​(p.Ala69Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000301 in 1,612,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ESRRB
NM_001379180.1 missense

Scores

1
6
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.85
Variant links:
Genes affected
ESRRB (HGNC:3473): (estrogen related receptor beta) This gene encodes a protein with similarity to the estrogen receptor. Its function is unknown; however, a similar protein in mouse plays an essential role in placental development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0066467524).
BP6
Variant 14-76439496-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-76439496-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178342.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr14-76439496-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0015 (229/152358) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00519 (216/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00463. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 102 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ESRRBNM_001379180.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.206C>T p.Ala69Val missense_variant 2/7 ENST00000644823.1 NP_001366109.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ESRRBENST00000644823.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.206C>T p.Ala69Val missense_variant 2/7 NM_001379180.1 ENSP00000493776 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00150
AC:
229
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00521
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000347
AC:
85
AN:
244822
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000300
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
133464
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000581
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000363
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000176
AC:
257
AN:
1460276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000167
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
726544
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00618
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000162
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000282
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00150
AC:
229
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00519
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000207
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00167
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00364
AC:
16
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000446
AC:
54

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 12, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 30, 2012Ala48Val in Exon 04 of ESRRB: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (12/3730) of African American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61760172). -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 02, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 22, 2023- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 35 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
ESRRB-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 17, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.040
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.019
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.076
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;.;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.10
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0066
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.073
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
.;L;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.85
N;N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.054
T;D;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
.;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.0040
B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.52, 0.52
MVP
0.73
MPC
0.39
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
5.2
gMVP
0.42

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61760172; hg19: chr14-76905839; API