Menu
GeneBe

rs61900036

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.4845C>A(p.Pro1615=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00164 in 1,588,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.246
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
BP6
Variant 11-77199811-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77199811-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178625.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr11-77199811-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.246 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4845C>A p.Pro1615= synonymous_variant 35/49 ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4845C>A p.Pro1615= synonymous_variant 35/491 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00124
AC:
294
AN:
236764
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
164
AN XY:
128124
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000297
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00392
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00175
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00169
AC:
2431
AN:
1436000
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
1182
AN XY:
709692
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000274
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000399
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000119
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00341
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00197
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00115
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00106
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00191
Alfa
AF:
0.00148
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000835
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 18, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineSep 22, 2017p.Pro1615Pro in exon 35 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.38% (95/24636) of Finnish chromosomes and 0.2% (237/120408) of Non-Finnish European chromosome s including 1 homozygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnom ad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs61900036). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 01, 2016- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
Cadd
Benign
7.0
Dann
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61900036; hg19: chr11-76910856; API