Menu
GeneBe

rs61941020

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.5237G>A(p.Arg1746Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00965 in 1,577,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 162 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1746R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0071 ( 7 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0099 ( 155 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.76
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0040839016).
BP6
Variant 12-88079219-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88079219-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126262.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-88079219-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-88079219-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr12-88079219-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00712 (1072/150466) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.043 (204/4748). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0381. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 546 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CEP290NM_025114.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5237G>A p.Arg1746Gln missense_variant 39/54 ENST00000552810.6
LOC124902977XR_007063393.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.887-3094C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CEP290ENST00000552810.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.5237G>A p.Arg1746Gln missense_variant 39/541 NM_025114.4 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00715
AC:
1075
AN:
150352
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00983
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00838
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0436
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00797
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0106
AC:
2316
AN:
217592
Hom.:
36
AF XY:
0.0123
AC XY:
1461
AN XY:
118348
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00542
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00615
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00723
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0437
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00812
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00862
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00992
AC:
14149
AN:
1427014
Hom.:
155
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
7718
AN XY:
708210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00654
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00601
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0403
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00855
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0121
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00712
AC:
1072
AN:
150466
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00745
AC XY:
546
AN XY:
73332
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00982
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00840
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0430
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00797
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00910
Alfa
AF:
0.00866
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00648
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00971
AC:
36
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0101
AC:
39
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00195
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00971
AC:
79
ExAC
AF:
0.0117
AC:
1412
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0330
AC:
118
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 18, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 21, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsOct 25, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 19, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31734136, 30478281, 27491411) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024CEP290: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Kidney disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenApr 01, 2020- -
Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 15, 2019- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Meckel syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -
Joubert syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
-0.21
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.0055
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.66
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0041
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.46
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.73
D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.11
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.22
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.47
.;.;P
Vest4
0.078
MPC
0.059
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.054
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61941020; hg19: chr12-88472996; API