rs61999313

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001040616.3(LINS1):c.1887C>T(p.Tyr629Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000532 in 1,613,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

LINS1
NM_001040616.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.28

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LINS1 (HGNC:30922): (lines homolog 1) The Drosophila segment polarity gene lin encodes a protein, lines, which plays important roles in development of the epidermis and hindgut. This gene encodes a protein containing a lines-like domain. This gene is located on chromosome 15 and clustered with the gene encoding ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 7. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

LINS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 27
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LINS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).

BP6

Variant 15-100569625-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-100569625-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 435757.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.28 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00286 (436/152264) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00939 (390/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00862. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 213 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LINS1	NM_001040616.3 link	c.1887C>T	p.Tyr629Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000314742.13	NP_001035706.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
LINS1	ENST00000314742.13 link	c.1887C>T	p.Tyr629Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	5	NM_001040616.3	ENSP00000318423.8
LINS1	ENST00000559169.1 link	n.2162C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	2
LINS1	ENST00000560783.1 link	n.190+4026C>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 3	5		ENSP00000474128.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00287

AC:

436

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00942

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000769

AC:

193

AN:

250944

AF XY:

0.000568

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000522

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000290

AC:

423

AN:

1460954

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000259

AC XY:

188

AN XY:

726608

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00921

AC:

308

AN:

33454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000604

AC:

AN:

44676

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26106

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000126

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86208

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000180

AC:

AN:

1111308

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000829

AC:

AN:

60342

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

110

137

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00286

AC:

436

AN:

152264

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00286

AC XY:

213

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00939

AC:

390

AN:

41544

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00242

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

106

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00133

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00323

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

LINS1: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 22, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Mar 16, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.58

CADD

Benign

8.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.36

PhyloP100

2.3

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over