rs624147

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002180.3(IGHMBP2):c.2439G>A(p.Ala813Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,603,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 28 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

IGHMBP2
NM_002180.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.68

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

IGHMBP2 (HGNC:5542): (immunoglobulin mu DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a helicase superfamily member that binds a specific DNA sequence from the immunoglobulin mu chain switch region. Mutations in this gene lead to spinal muscle atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

IGHMBP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hereditary peripheral neuropathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen

IGHMBP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 11-68936919-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68936919-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 194204.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.68 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00996 (1517/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0346 (1439/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0331. There are 28 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 733 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 28 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
IGHMBP2	NM_002180.3 link	c.2439G>A	p.Ala813Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	ENST00000255078.8	NP_002171.2	P38935

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IGHMBP2	ENST00000255078.8 link	c.2439G>A	p.Ala813Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	1	NM_002180.3	ENSP00000255078.4		P38935

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00996

AC:

1516

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0347

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00573

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00258

AC:

576

AN:

223502

AF XY:

0.00185

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0358

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00219

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000165

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00107

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00109

AC:

1584

AN:

1451048

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000962

AC XY:

694

AN XY:

721118

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0366

AC:

1220

AN:

33306

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00205

AC:

AN:

42882

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25906

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39346

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000235

AC:

AN:

85178

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000546

AC:

AN:

5496

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000135

AC:

150

AN:

1107390

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00202

AC:

121

AN:

59940

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

215

323

430

538

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

126

168

210

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00996

AC:

1517

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00984

AC XY:

733

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0346

AC:

1439

AN:

41558

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00359

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000162

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00567

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

142

212

283

354

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00234

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0114

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 09, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 28, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 01, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

3.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.48

PhyloP100

-1.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over