rs62516290
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001001557.4(GDF6):c.406+28C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001001557.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Klippel-Feil syndrome 1, autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- microphthalmiaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- multiple synostoses syndrome 4Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- isolated Klippel-Feil syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Leber congenital amaurosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- isolated microphthalmia 4Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leber congenital amaurosis 17Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDF6 | NM_001001557.4 | c.406+28C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | ENST00000287020.7 | NP_001001557.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461022Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726918 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at