rs62623378
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018897.3(DNAH7):c.3059T>C(p.Ile1020Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0985 in 1,563,484 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,409 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018897.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0817 AC: 12423AN: 152076Hom.: 683 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0899 AC: 21205AN: 235866Hom.: 1182 AF XY: 0.0951 AC XY: 12171AN XY: 128036
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.100 AC: 141571AN: 1411290Hom.: 7726 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.102 AC XY: 70849AN XY: 696516
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0816 AC: 12414AN: 152194Hom.: 683 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0816 AC XY: 6071AN XY: 74392
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
DNAH7-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at