rs62625033
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_015634.4(KIFBP):c.518T>C(p.Met173Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00786 in 1,584,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M173V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015634.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIFBP | NM_015634.4 | c.518T>C | p.Met173Thr | missense_variant | 2/7 | ENST00000361983.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIFBP | ENST00000361983.7 | c.518T>C | p.Met173Thr | missense_variant | 2/7 | 1 | NM_015634.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00606 AC: 923AN: 152218Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00650 AC: 1632AN: 251074Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00669 AC XY: 908AN XY: 135704
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00806 AC: 11542AN: 1432580Hom.: 66 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00800 AC XY: 5720AN XY: 714664
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00605 AC: 922AN: 152336Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00529 AC XY: 394AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 19, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | KIFBP: BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 08, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
KIFBP-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 26, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Goldberg-Shprintzen syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at