rs62637630

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):​c.3567C>T​(p.Gly1189Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,552,730 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 7 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.295

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
PTCH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • basal cell nevus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • holoprosencephaly 7
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • holoprosencephaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 9-95449306-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95449306-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 220553.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.295 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00606 (923/152384) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0213 (887/41592). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0202. There are 7 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 427 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 923 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkc.3567C>T p.Gly1189Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 24 ENST00000331920.11 NP_000255.2 Q13635-1
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkc.3564C>T p.Gly1188Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 24 ENST00000437951.6 NP_001077072.1 Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkc.3567C>T p.Gly1189Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 24 5 NM_000264.5 ENSP00000332353.6 Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkc.3564C>T p.Gly1188Gly synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 24 5 NM_001083603.3 ENSP00000389744.2 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00606
AC:
922
AN:
152266
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00149
AC:
234
AN:
157404
AF XY:
0.00109
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000924
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000401
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000793
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000678
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000604
AC:
846
AN:
1400346
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000538
AC XY:
372
AN XY:
691324
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0202
AC:
648
AN:
32090
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000836
AC:
30
AN:
35892
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25210
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
36470
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000113
AC:
9
AN:
79760
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000197
AC:
9
AN:
45580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
11
AN:
5704
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000629
AC:
68
AN:
1081464
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00122
AC:
71
AN:
58176
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
56
112
167
223
279
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00606
AC:
923
AN:
152384
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00573
AC XY:
427
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
887
AN:
41592
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
20
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000176
AC:
12
AN:
68044
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
47
94
140
187
234
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00185
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00622
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 02, 2022
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 10, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Gorlin syndrome Benign:3
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Feb 10, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Gorlin syndrome;C1835820:Holoprosencephaly 7;C2751544:Basal cell carcinoma, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
May 27, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
4.8
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-0.29
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs62637630; hg19: chr9-98211588; API