rs62638195

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 4P and 9B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_002905.5(RDH5):ā€‹c.97A>Gā€‹(p.Ile33Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00229 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I33N) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0025 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0023 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

RDH5
NM_002905.5 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.40
Variant links:
Genes affected
RDH5 (HGNC:9940): (retinol dehydrogenase 5) This gene encodes an enzyme belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR) family. This retinol dehydrogenase functions to catalyze the final step in the biosynthesis of 11-cis retinaldehyde, which is the universal chromophore of visual pigments. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive fundus albipunctatus, a rare form of night blindness that is characterized by a delay in the regeneration of cone and rod photopigments. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BLOC1S1 (biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex-1, subunit 1) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1
In a topological_domain Lumenal (size 266) in uniprot entity RDH5_HUMAN there are 57 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (97%) in NM_002905.5
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr12-55721282-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010990709).
BP6
Variant 12-55721281-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-55721281-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 258859.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr12-55721281-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RDH5NM_002905.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.97A>G p.Ile33Val missense_variant 2/5 ENST00000257895.10 NP_002896.2
BLOC1S1-RDH5NR_037658.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.370-408A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
RDH5NM_001199771.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.97A>G p.Ile33Val missense_variant 2/5 NP_001186700.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RDH5ENST00000257895.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.97A>G p.Ile33Val missense_variant 2/51 NM_002905.5 ENSP00000257895 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00247
AC:
376
AN:
152196
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00265
AC:
665
AN:
251068
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00255
AC XY:
347
AN XY:
135824
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00245
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00227
AC:
3323
AN:
1461786
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00225
AC XY:
1636
AN XY:
727198
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000693
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0195
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00247
AC:
376
AN:
152314
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00322
AC XY:
240
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000216
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000915
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00142
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000979
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00209
AC:
18
ExAC
AF:
0.00218
AC:
265
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pigmentary retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 22, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.21
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.090
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.52
D;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.047
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.040
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.71
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.078
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.96
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.86
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.47
Sift
Benign
0.048
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.10
T;T
Polyphen
0.72
P;P
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs62638195; hg19: chr12-56115065; API