rs62642468
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001764.3(CD1B):c.310G>A(p.Gly104Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0125 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 160 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001764.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD1B | NM_001764.3 | c.310G>A | p.Gly104Ser | missense_variant | 2/6 | ENST00000368168.4 | NP_001755.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD1B | ENST00000368168.4 | c.310G>A | p.Gly104Ser | missense_variant | 2/6 | 1 | NM_001764.3 | ENSP00000357150 | P1 | |
CD1B | ENST00000451207.5 | c.214G>A | p.Gly72Ser | missense_variant | 1/5 | 3 | ENSP00000395161 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00989 AC: 1505AN: 152162Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00931 AC: 2333AN: 250508Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.00946 AC XY: 1282AN XY: 135488
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0128 AC: 18707AN: 1461724Hom.: 145 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0125 AC XY: 9060AN XY: 727168
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00987 AC: 1503AN: 152280Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00939 AC XY: 699AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 11, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at