rs62646879
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000400017.7(RPGRIP1):c.256C>T(p.Arg86Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00156 in 1,612,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0084 ( 14 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 ( 19 hom. )
Consequence
RPGRIP1
ENST00000400017.7 missense
ENST00000400017.7 missense
Scores
6
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.283
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003682822).
BP6
Variant 14-21301003-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21301003-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 99816.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-21301003-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00836 (1273/152332) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0291 (1209/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0277. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 582 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | NM_020366.4 | c.256C>T | p.Arg86Trp | missense_variant | 4/25 | ENST00000400017.7 | NP_065099.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000400017.7 | c.256C>T | p.Arg86Trp | missense_variant | 4/25 | 1 | NM_020366.4 | ENSP00000382895 | P2 | |
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000557771.5 | c.256C>T | p.Arg86Trp | missense_variant | 3/24 | 5 | ENSP00000451219 | A2 | ||
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000556336.5 | c.256C>T | p.Arg86Trp | missense_variant | 3/21 | 5 | ENSP00000450445 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00836 AC: 1272AN: 152214Hom.: 14 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1272
AN:
152214
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00186 AC: 453AN: 243620Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00131 AC XY: 175AN XY: 133348
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
453
AN:
243620
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
133348
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000847 AC: 1237AN: 1460334Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000719 AC XY: 522AN XY: 726412
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1237
AN:
1460334
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
522
AN XY:
726412
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00836 AC: 1273AN: 152332Hom.: 14 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00781 AC XY: 582AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1273
AN:
152332
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
582
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
92
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
283
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 13, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 14, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 18, 2022 | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.98
.;.;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.25
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at