rs63749841
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BP6_Strong
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2437A>G(p.Met813Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
7
10
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 8.85
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.784
BP6
Variant 2-47478498-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47478498-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Uncertain_significance]. Clinvar id is 90972.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=9}. Variant chr2-47478498-A-G is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.2437A>G | p.Met813Val | missense_variant | 14/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.2437A>G | p.Met813Val | missense_variant | 14/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251338Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135844
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
251338
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135844
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000889 AC: 13AN: 1461800Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
727192
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74362
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74362
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:3
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, reviewed by expert panel | curation | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Jun 13, 2018 | Variant reclassification due to new tumour Likelihood Ratios: Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probabilty is in class 3. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 22, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jun 02, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 06, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 12, 2015 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 19, 2018 | This variant is denoted MSH2 c.2437A>G at the cDNA level, p.Met813Val (M813V) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Methionine to a Valine (ATG>GTG). This variant has been identified in at least one individual with colon cancer whose tumor was shown to be microsatellite stable and exhibit expression of all four mismatch repair proteins on immunohistochemistry (Gille 2002, Wielders 2014). Functional assays conducted in mouse embryonic stem cells demonstrated that this variant displayed protein expression and mismatch repair activity comparable to wild type (Wielders 2014). MSH2 Met813Val was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). MSH2 Met813Val is located in the ATPase domain (Lutzen 2008). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether MSH2 Met813Val is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 17, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with Lynch syndrome (PMIDs: 31386297 (2019), 24501230 (2014), 12373605 (2002)) and healthy, unaffected individuals (PMID: 25637381 (2018)). Experimental studies report the variant does not impact MSH2 function (PMIDs: 33357406 (2021), 24501230 (2014)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/113690 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 22, 2022 | This missense variant replaces methionine with valine at codon 813 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). This variant does not impact MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold <= -1.32, PMID: 33357406). In another functional study, this variant caused no significant difference in microsatellite levels or DNA damage response compared to wild type (PMID: 24501230). This variant has been reported in individuals affected by colorectal cancer but with clinical features not indicative of Lynch syndrome (the tumors exhibited microsatellite stability and the presence of MSH2 protein (PMID: 12373605, 24501230)) and in individuals affected with cancer who did not meet Bethesda Lynch syndrome criteria (PMID: 31386297). This variant has been identified in 3/251338 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 16, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 31, 2023 | Variant summary: MSH2 c.2437A>G (p.Met813Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS, C-terminal domain (IPR000432) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251338 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2437A>G has been reported in the literature in suspected or affected Lynch Syndrome individuals/families (example: Gille_2002, Wielders_2014, Kiyozumi_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1 c.1961delA, p.Lys654fsX47; ATM c.2921+1G>T), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function demonstrated no reduction in protein level and no functional MMR defects for p.M813V and determined it to have similar function to the wild type. Furthermore, tumor analysis showed microsatellite stability and the presence of all four MMR proteins (Gille_2002, Wielders_2014). An additional study shows a neutral effect of the protein (Jia_2021). These data provide further supporting evidence for a benign role of the variant. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 25637381, 18383312, 12373605, 33357406, 31386297, 24501230). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments; seven submitters classified it as a variant of uncertain significance, two classified it as liekly benign, and one classified it as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 18, 2023 | The c.2437A>G (p.Met813Val) variant in MSH2 has been reported in 2 individuals with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (Gille 2002 PMID: 12373605, Wielders 2014 PMID: 24501230). It has also been identified in 0.003% (3/113690) of European (non-Finnish) chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 90972). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In vitro and in vivo functional studies provide some evidence that this variant does not impact protein function (Wielders 2014 PMID: 24501230), and a tumor derived from a patient with this variant was shown to be microsatellite stable (Gille 2002 PMID: 12373605). In summary, while the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS3, BS1_Supporting. - |
Colorectal cancer, non-polyposis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 25, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
Polyphen
B;.;.;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at