rs63750142
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_002087.4(GRN):c.903G>A(p.Ser301Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000811 in 1,613,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S301S) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002087.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN | NM_002087.4 | c.903G>A | p.Ser301Ser | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000053867.8 | NP_002078.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN | ENST00000053867.8 | c.903G>A | p.Ser301Ser | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_002087.4 | ENSP00000053867.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152064Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000569 AC: 143AN: 251206Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000589 AC XY: 80AN XY: 135840
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000854 AC: 1248AN: 1461330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000824 AC XY: 599AN XY: 727016
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74408
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | GRN: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 29, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 25, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
GRN-related frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Tdp43 inclusions;C3539123:Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 05, 2024 | - - |
GRN-related frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Tdp43 inclusions Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at