rs63750466
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.4G>A(p.Ala2Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,595,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A2A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
8
7
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 8.80
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 2-47403195-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47403195-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 41650.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47403195-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-47403195-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.4G>A | p.Ala2Thr | missense_variant | 1/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.4G>A | p.Ala2Thr | missense_variant | 1/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152258
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000152 AC: 33AN: 216606Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000119 AC XY: 14AN XY: 117838
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
216606
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
117838
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000170 AC: 245AN: 1442930Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000173 AC XY: 124AN XY: 716142
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
245
AN:
1442930
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
124
AN XY:
716142
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74390
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152258
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74390
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
17
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:12
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 06, 2018 | The MSH2 c.4G>A; p.Ala2Thr variant (rs63750466) is reported in the literature in multiple individuals with Lynch syndrome (Kurzawski 2006, Mangold 2005a, Mangold 2005b, Nagasaka 2010, Pagenstecher 2006, Parc 2003). However, it has been reported to co-occur with a pathogenic MSH2 nonsense variant (Mangold 2005a) and a 3'EPCAM deletion where MSH2 promoter methylation was seen (Nagasaka 2010). This variant is also reported to co-segregate with disease in a large Lynch syndrome family where loss of the MSH2 protein was seen in four individual's tumors; however, RNA analysis showed normal expression, suggesting this variant may be a marker in this family but the functional consequences are uncertain (Pagenstecher 2006). This variant is considered uncertain by an expert review panel in ClinVar (Variation ID: 41650), and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.01% (34/241756 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. This variant occurs in a conserved nucleotide of the Kozak consensus sequence, but computational algorithms do not agree as to the effect this variant may have on the protein (SIFT: Tolerated, PolyPhen2: Probably Damaging). Based on available information, the clinical significance of p.Ala2Thr is uncertain at this time. REFERENCES Kurzawski G et al. Germline MSH2 and MLH1 mutational spectrum including large rearrangements in HNPCC families from Poland (update study). Clin Genet. 2006 Jan;69(1):40-7. Mangold E et al. Spectrum and frequencies of mutations in MSH2 and MLH1 identified in 1,721 German families suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005a Sep 20;116(5):692-702. Mangold E et al. Tumours from MSH2 mutation carriers show loss of MSH2 expression but many tumours from MLH1 mutation carriers exhibit weak positive MLH1 staining. J Pathol. 2005b Dec;207(4):385-95. Nagasaka T et al. Somatic hypermethylation of MSH2 is a frequent event in Lynch Syndrome colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 15;70(8):3098-108. Pagenstecher C et al. Aberrant splicing in MLH1 and MSH2 due to exonic and intronic variants. Hum Genet. 2006 Mar;119(1-2):9-22. Parc Y et al. Cancer risk in 348 French MSH2 or MLH1 gene carriers. J Med Genet. 2003 Mar;40(3):208-13. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 06, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 09, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 09, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jun 11, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 24, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 03, 2019 | Variant summary: MSH2 c.4G>A (p.Ala2Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This was confirmed by RT-PCR results (Pagenstecher_2006). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 217422 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication data). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome (0.00016 vs 0.00057), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant, c.4G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome, uveal malignant melanoma or autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndromes (Mangold_2005, Kurzawski_2006, Schrader_2016, Bonadona_2011, Hajkova_2018, Zhang_2015). One publication reported one family where it showed segregation of this variant with Lynch syndrome (Mangold_2005). However, in many reports, not all MMR genes were tested or MLPA applied. Consequently, these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. Furthermore, in some of these families co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (MSH2 c.1835C>G, p.Ser612X (Mangold_2005); EPCAM deletion associated with MSH2 promoter methylation (Nagasaka_2010); MSH2 c.1delA (UMD); RAD51C c.97C>T, p.Gln33X (Internal database)), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (InSiGHT) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (Likely benign (n=4 to include the expert panel), VUS (n=3)). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 24, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 05, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Jun 13, 2018 | Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability < 0.05 (0.006) - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Oct 08, 2021 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH2 p.Ala2Thr variant was identified in 15 of 38724 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with lynch syndrome or colorectal cancer (Bonadona 2011, Dymerska 2010, Johnston 2012, Kurzawski 2006, Mangold 2005, Nagasaka 2010, Parc 2003). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750466) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (as uncertain significance, reviewed by an expert panel including 6x as uncertain significance and 2x as likely benign), Clinvitae (5x), UMD-LSDB (30x as neutral), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and in the Insight Hereditary Tumors database (19x). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic MSH2 variant (c.1delA, p.Met1?), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ala2Thr variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 34 of 241756 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: “Other” in 1 of 5740 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 25 of 109176 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and Finnish in 8 of 21430 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004); it was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or South Asian populations. The p.Ala2 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In one study, Immunohistochemical analysis of this variant in tumors from relatives (mother and son - both of whom were carriers of the variant) revealed a loss of MSH2 protein expression; this finding supported a pathogenic role for the MSH2, c.4G>A, p.Ala2Thr variant (Mangold 2005). In another publication this variant is reported to segregate with the disease in several family members (at least 10 meioses) and showed loss of MSH2 expression in tumors of four affected family members. This variant is clearly linked to the disease in this specific family (Pagenstecher 2006). However, there is conflicting evidence in the literature; this variant was identified in an individual as co-occurring with pathogenic variant in MSH2 (c.1835C>G, p.S612X) (Lucci-Cordisco 2006, Mangold 2005). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Breast carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
MSH2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 28, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Feb 01, 2018 | MSH2 p.A2T has been reported to co-occur with a MSH2 nonsense variant and a 3' EPCAM deletion where MSH2 promoter methylation was identified (Mangold 2005, Nagasaka 2010). Functional RNA studies performed on peripheral blood found normal RNA levels in patients that carry p.A2T (Pagenstecher 2006). MSH2 p.A2T was observed at an allele frequency of 0.0724% (14/19320 alleles) in large population cohorts (NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, Lek 2016), and it was observed in 1/208 individuals with atherosclerosis, with no specific information about cancer history (Johnston 2012). - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;.;T
Polyphen
D;.;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at