rs63750555
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):āc.69A>Gā(p.Glu23Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000719 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.000073 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MLH1
NM_000249.4 synonymous
NM_000249.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.17
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 3-36993616-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-36993616-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183075.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.17 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | c.69A>G | p.Glu23Glu | synonymous_variant | 1/19 | ENST00000231790.8 | NP_000240.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | c.69A>G | p.Glu23Glu | synonymous_variant | 1/19 | 1 | NM_000249.4 | ENSP00000231790.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251300Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
251300
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000725 AC: 106AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000715 AC XY: 52AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
106
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
727238
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74368
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74368
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 16, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 05, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 31, 2020 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Feb 16, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 13, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MLH1 p.Glu23= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the UMD-LSDB. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750555) as "With Uncertain significance allele" and in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Color and Counsyl; as uncertain significance by one submitter). The variant was identified in control databases in 2 of 246094 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000008 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in European population in 2 of 111564 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Glu23= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer,) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time, although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 14, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 29, 2019 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at