rs63750710
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.986A>C(p.His329Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H329N) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | c.986A>C | p.His329Pro | missense_variant | 11/19 | ENST00000231790.8 | NP_000240.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | c.986A>C | p.His329Pro | missense_variant | 11/19 | 1 | NM_000249.4 | ENSP00000231790.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Apr 07, 2023 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Sep 01, 1997 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Variant causes splicing aberrations (full inactivation of variant allele) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 30, 2021 | The p.H329P pathogenic mutation (also known as c.986A>C), located in coding exon 11 of the MLH1 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 986. The histidine at codon 329 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration is identified in multiple individuals diagnosed with Lynch-related tumors that demonstrated high microsatellite instability and loss of MLH1 on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or whose family history met Amsterdam Criteria (Müller-Koch Y et al. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2001 Nov;6:473-82; Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49; Kansikas M et al. Hum Mutat. 2011 Jan;32:107-1; Hardt K et al. Fam Cancer. 2011 Jun;10:273-84; Ambry internal data). In an individual diagnosed with colorectal and endometrial cancer at less than 50 years of age with loss of MLH1 and PMS2 on IHC, cDNA long-range RT-PCR analysis of full-length MLH1 transcripts demonstrated that this alteration results in abnormal splicing (Morak M et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 12;27:1808-1820). In addition, an unpublished observation reported that the presence of this alteration completely abrogates normal splicing of the mutant allele in cDNA-analysis (Hardt K et al. Fam Cancer. 2011 Jun;10:273-84). In two functional studies, compared to wild-type MLH1, p.H329P demonstrated similar MMR efficiency and decreased expression in one study but reduced MMR activity and retained expression in the other study (Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49; Takahashi M et al. Cancer Res. 2007 May;67:4595-604). In addition, this alteration demonstrated aberrant nuclear localization in 293T human cells (Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49). This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the supporting evidence, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at