rs63750716

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.505A>G​(p.Ile169Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000148 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.86
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01151973).
BP6
Variant 2-47410232-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47410232-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 91115.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47410232-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000149 (218/1461884) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00534 (212/39696). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00475. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 108 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkc.505A>G p.Ile169Val missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkc.505A>G p.Ile169Val missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 1 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000469
AC:
118
AN:
251484
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000412
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00636
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000149
AC:
218
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000149
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00534
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152290
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00407
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000308
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000238
ExAC
AF:
0.000527
AC:
64
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
May 05, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MSH2 c.505A>G (p.Ile169Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS, connector domain (IPR007860) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00047 in 251484 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0064 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 11 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00057), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.505A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colon cancer and gastric cancer (Tomita_2003, Park_2008, Kim_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Lynch Syndrome. Additionally, Park_2008 reports that this variant did not co-segregate with disease in one family. Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported (MSH2 c.905T>A, p.Leu302Ter) (Tomita_2003), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports this variant showed no damaging effect of this variant (Zhu_2013). Six ClinVar submitters including one expert panel (InSiGHT, classified as likely benign in 2013) (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (1x), likely benign (3x) and benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Sep 05, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Feb 27, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Dec 04, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease. This variant has been observed in conjunction with multiple pathogenic variants, reducing the likelihood this variant itself is pathogenic. -

Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Dec 05, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 30, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 02, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Sep 20, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: research

Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability 0.001-0.049 -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The MSH2 p.Ile169Val variant was identified in 5 of 4626 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome, ovarian cancer or diffuse large B cell lymphoma (Fan 2005, Liu 2014, Miranda 2013, Pal 2012, Ward 2013). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750716) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano; as likely benign by four submitters; and as uncertain significance by Center for Human Genetics). The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB. The variant was identified in control databases in 124 of 277218 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0005, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 2 of 6468 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003) and East Asian in 122 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), while the variant was not observed in the African, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ile169 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
May 01, 2019
Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Muir-Torré syndrome;C2936783:Lynch syndrome 1;C5436806:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2 Benign:1
Apr 18, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.74
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.39
T;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.028
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.80
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
N;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.38
N;N;N;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.41
Sift
Benign
0.38
T;T;T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T;T;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.0073
ClinPred
0.010
T
GERP RS
-1.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.035
gMVP
0.32

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63750716; hg19: chr2-47637371; COSMIC: COSV51876617; API