rs63750952
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PP3_Strong
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.191A>G(p.Asn64Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,612,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000026 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense
NM_000249.4 missense
Scores
10
7
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 8.87
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.975
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | c.191A>G | p.Asn64Ser | missense_variant | 2/19 | ENST00000231790.8 | NP_000240.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | c.191A>G | p.Asn64Ser | missense_variant | 2/19 | 1 | NM_000249.4 | ENSP00000231790 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251442Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135894
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
251442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135894
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1460664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 726742
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
1460664
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
726742
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74366
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74366
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
6
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:13Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 06, 2023 | The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00007 (9/129152 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals/families with colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 21404117 (2011), 16736289 (2006), and 9311737 (1997)), endometrial cancer (PMID: 26552419 (2015)), breast cancer (PMID: 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)), and also in one case of pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289 (2017)). In addition, this variant has been reported in healthy control individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). Functional studies have observed the variant having intermediate levels of MLH1 expression, mismatch repair activity, and PMS2 interaction (PMIDs: 30504929 (2018), 26552419 (2015), 22843852 (2012), 21404117 (2011), 17510385 (2007), 17210669 (2007), 17135187 (2006), and 15475387 (2004)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 21, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Published functional studies are inconclusive: reduced MMR activity, no impact on nuclear localization, and conflicting results regarding mutator effect, PMS2 binding, MLH1 protein expression (Ellison 2004, Plotz 2006, Takahashi 2007, Wanat 2007, Hardt 2011, Bolz 2012, Drost 2018); Observed in individuals with MLH1-related cancers including segregation with disease in one family, as well as in individuals with melanoma (Wijnen 1997, Spaepen 2006, Hardt 2011, Shindo 2017, Yehia 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17135187, 21404117, 23741719, 29684080, 17510385, 17210669, 25525159, 9311737, 22843852, 15475387, 26552419, 16736289, 24362816, 28767289, 30504929, 31697235, 31332305, 32719484, 30755392) - |
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 15, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 28, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Aug 08, 2022 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Nov 30, 2023 | This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 64 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown that this variant results in a partial loss of mismatch repair function and moderately reduced protein stability and binding ability to PMS2 protein (PMID: 17135187, 17510385, 21404117, 30504929, 36054288). This variant has been reported in individuals from Lynch syndrome families (PMID: 9311737, 16736289, 21404117). In one of these families, two affected siblings were carriers of this variant but their affected sister with microsatellite instability-high tumor did not carry this variant (PMID: 16736289). Three unaffected siblings from this family did not carry this variant. In another family, this variant co-occurred in trans with a different pathogenic variant in the MLH1 gene (PMID: 21404117, 31332305). This variant has also been reported in individuals affected with endometrial cancer (PMID: 26552419) or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was observed in 6/60466 cases and 5/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991) This variant has been identified in 10/282844 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 17, 2024 | This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 64 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have inconclusive results, with several showing this variant results in partial loss of mismatch repair function and moderately reduced protein stability and binding ability to PMS2 protein (PMID: 17135187, 17510385, 21404117, 30504929, 36054288). Another cell-based functional assay also demonstrated the variant resulted in partial protein stability, however, the variant also displayed positive damage response signaling and DNA repair function (PMID: 36054288). This variant has been reported in individuals from Lynch syndrome families (PMID: 9311737, 16736289, 21404117). In one of these families, two affected siblings were carriers of this variant but their affected sister with microsatellite instability-high tumor did not carry this variant (PMID: 16736289). Three unaffected siblings from this family did not carry this variant. In another family, this variant co-occurred in trans with a different pathogenic variant in the MLH1 gene (PMID: 21404117, 31332305). This variant has also been reported in individuals affected with endometrial cancer (PMID: 26552419) or pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289). In a large breast cancer case-control study, this variant was observed in 6/60466 cases and 5/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991) This variant has been identified in 10/282844 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 27, 2024 | The p.N64S variant (also known as c.191A>G), located in coding exon 2 of the MLH1 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 191. The asparagine at codon 64 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been identified in several colorectal cancer cohorts that are suspicious for Lynch syndrome and, in at least one case, the tumor retained expression of MLH1 and MSH2 on immunohistochemical staining (Wijnen J et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997 Aug;61:329-35; Spaepen M et al. Fam. Cancer 2006;5:179-89; Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84; Stojcev Z et al. Acta Biochim Pol, 2013 Jun;60:195-8). One report shows that this alteration segregates with 5 of 6 siblings affected with colorectal cancer (Spaepen M et al. Fam. Cancer 2006;5:179-89). In another report, this alteration was found to co-occur with MLH1 c.986A>C, a functionally validated splicing mutation, in a patient with three gastrointestinal primary tumors diagnosed at 47. The MLH1 p.N64S alteration was inherited from the proband's mother who was unaffected at age 71, and while the paternal family history met Amsterdam criteria, suggesting the father likely carried the MLH1 c.986A>C pathogenic mutation, the inheritance of this alteration was not confirmed (Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84). Numerous functional studies show reduced but not abolished function including yeast mutator assays, expression assays, in vitro mismatch repair assays and heterodimerization assays (Ellison AR et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct;32:5321-38; Plotz G et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Nov;34:6574-86; Takahashi M et al. Cancer Res. 2007 May;67:4595-604; Wanat JJ et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007 Feb;16:445-52; Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer 2011 Jun;10:273-84). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 29, 2017 | - - |
Muir-Torré syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
MLH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 08, 2024 | The MLH1 c.191A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn64Ser. This variant has been reported in individuals with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Wijnen et al. 1997. PubMed ID: 9311737; Hardt et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21404117) and ovarian cancer (Table S7 in Lilyquist et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28888541) and pancreatic cancer (Shindo et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28767289). Functional studies have indicated the p.Asn65Ser variant results in reduced mismatch repair activity and reduced MLH1 expression (Ellison et al. 2004. PubMed ID: 15475387; Wanat et al. 2007. PubMed ID: 17210669; Takahashi et al. 2007. PubMed ID: 17510385). This variant is reported in 0.0070% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. This variant has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar with the majority being uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/89947). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Choreoathetosis;C0266476:Aqueductal stenosis;C0557874:Global developmental delay Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Personalized Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles | Mar 15, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 64 of the MLH1 protein (p.Asn64Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs63750952, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic, ovarian cancer and/or Lynch syndrome (PMID: 9311737, 16736289, 21404117, 26552419, 28514183, 28767289, 28888541, 31332305). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 89947). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects MLH1 function (PMID: 17135187, 17510385, 21404117, 30504929). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne | Oct 11, 2024 | According to the ClinGen InSiGHT ACMG MLH1 v1.0.0 criteria we chose these criteria: PP3 (supporting pathogenic): Applied prior : 0.72 (thus >0.68 & ≤0.81), BS2 (strong benign): Hardt 2011 (PMID: 21404117): reported to co-occur in trans with a known pathogenic MLH1 variant (H329P, ClinVar ID: 17085) in a patient who did not demonstrate a Constitutive MMR-Deficiency Disease phenotype, BS3 (strong benign): Rath 2022 (PMID: 36054288): OddsPath_Non-functional = 5.00E-2 (thus > 0.48) + Morak 2019 (PMID: 31332305): No effect on splicing. Drost 2019 (PMID: 30504929): study was supportive of neither a pathogenic or benign classification Invitae (Accession: SCV000218899.13): Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties [...] performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. Various old functional studies showing conflicting results regarding effect of variant on protein function. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
H
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at