rs63751098
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.161G>C(p.Gly54Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000546 in 1,574,636 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000059 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MSH6
NM_000179.3 missense
NM_000179.3 missense
Scores
1
4
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.415
Genes affected
MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.11204401).
BP6
Variant 2-47783394-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47783394-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 89208.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47783394-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.161G>C | p.Gly54Ala | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000234420.11 | NP_000170.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.161G>C | p.Gly54Ala | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_000179.3 | ENSP00000234420 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000283 AC: 5AN: 176940Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000408 AC XY: 4AN XY: 98060
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
176940
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
98060
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 84AN: 1422346Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000539 AC XY: 38AN XY: 704704
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
84
AN:
1422346
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
704704
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152290Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152290
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:9
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 19, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 23, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 20, 2016 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 30, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jan 25, 2017 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 08, 2019 | The p.Gly54Ala variant in MSH6 has been reported in 1 individuals with colorectal cancer (Peterlongo 2013) and in 1 individual with ovarian cancer (Pal 2012). It has also been identified in 4/72210 of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was classified as Likely benign on September 5, 2013 by the ClinGen-approved InSiGHT expert panel (Variation ID 89208). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity (Ali 2012, Terui 2013). In vivo functional studies provide some evidence that this variant does not impact protein function (Peterlong 2013). In summary, the p.Gly54Ala variant is classified as Likely Benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: BS3, BP4. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 21, 2022 | Variant summary: MSH6 c.161G>C (p.Gly54Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 176940 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.161G>C has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with Colorectal Cancer with positive MSH6 on IHC and MSS tumor (Peterlongo_2003) as well as in patients with breast/ovarian cancer without strong evidence for causality (Pal_2012, Tung_2014). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: five have classified the variant as likely benign, two as benign, and one as of uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14520694, 23047549, 22290698, 23621914, 24933000, 26332594) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 28, 2022 | In the published literature, this variant has been identified in individuals with ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 14520694 (2003), 23047549 (2012)). Internal laboratory indicates that this variant was observed with a pathogenic variant in the MUTYH gene, suggesting that this variant may not be the primary cause of disease. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000055 (4/72210 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is disease causing or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 08, 2022 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability 0.001-0.049 - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
0.19
.;B
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at