rs63751651
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PVS1_StrongPM2PP5_Very_Strong
The ENST00000231790.8(MLH1):c.2104-2_2104-1delAG variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. 1/1 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000231790.8 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Coding sequence variation resulting in a stop codon -
MLH1 NM_000249.3:c.2104-1_2104-2del has a 93.2% probability of pathogenicity based on combining prior probability from public data with a likelihood ratio of 26.5 to 1, generated from evidence of seeing this as a somatic mutation in a tumor with loss of heterozygosity at the MLH1 locus. See Shirts et al 2018, PMID 29887214. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The c.2104_2105delAG variant, located in coding exon 19 of the MLH1 gene, results from a deletion of two nucleotides at nucleotide positions 2104 to 2105, leading to an alternate stop codon (p.S702*). This variant has been reported in an individual diagnosed with MSI-high colorectal cancer meeting Amsterdam I criteria; MLH1 and MSH2 proteins were reported as present by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Syngal S et al. JAMA, 1999 Jul;282:247-53; Wahlberg SS et al. Cancer Res., 2002 Jun;62:3485-92). This truncation occurs at the 3' terminus of MLH1, is not expected to trigger nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, and impacts only the last 55 amino acids of the protein. However, structural analysis suggests that this alteration perturbs a known functional domain responsible for binding to and stabilizing PMS2 (Mohd AB et al. DNA Repair (Amst.), 2006 Mar;5:347-61). As such, this alteration is interpreted as likely pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at