rs6474414
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_000749.5(CHRNB3):c.53-3524A>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.614 in 152,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33,226 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.61 ( 33226 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
CHRNB3
NM_000749.5 intron
NM_000749.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.541
Genes affected
CHRNB3 (HGNC:1963): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 3 subunit) The nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are members of a superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast signal transmission at synapses. The nAChRs are (hetero)pentamers composed of homologous subunits. The subunits that make up the muscle and neuronal forms of nAChRs are encoded by separate genes and have different primary structure. There are several subtypes of neuronal nAChRs that vary based on which homologous subunits are arranged around the central channel. They are classified as alpha-subunits if, like muscle alpha-1 (MIM 100690), they have a pair of adjacent cysteines as part of the presumed acetylcholine binding site. Subunits lacking these cysteine residues are classified as beta-subunits (Groot Kormelink and Luyten, 1997 [PubMed 9009220]). Elliott et al. (1996) [PubMed 8906617] stated that the proposed structure for each subunit is a conserved N-terminal extracellular domain followed by 3 conserved transmembrane domains, a variable cytoplasmic loop, a fourth conserved transmembrane domain, and a short C-terminal extracellular region.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.786 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNB3 | NM_000749.5 | c.53-3524A>C | intron_variant | ENST00000289957.3 | NP_000740.1 | |||
CHRNB3 | NM_001347717.2 | c.-171+712A>C | intron_variant | NP_001334646.1 | ||||
LOC105379396 | XR_007060900.1 | n.983T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNB3 | ENST00000289957.3 | c.53-3524A>C | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000749.5 | ENSP00000289957.2 | ||||
CHRNB3 | ENST00000534391.1 | c.-171+712A>C | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000433913.1 | |||||
CHRNB3 | ENST00000531610.5 | n.472+712A>C | intron_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.614 AC: 93368AN: 151984Hom.: 33219 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
93368
AN:
151984
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.614 AC: 93388AN: 152102Hom.: 33226 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.620 AC XY: 46081AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
93388
AN:
152102
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
46081
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2437
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at