rs6476092
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001258282.3(LINGO2):c.-394-49481C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.242 in 151,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,859 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 4859 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
LINGO2
NM_001258282.3 intron
NM_001258282.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0580
Publications
6 publications found
Genes affected
LINGO2 (HGNC:21207): (leucine rich repeat and Ig domain containing 2) Predicted to act upstream of or within positive regulation of synapse assembly. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. Predicted to be active in extracellular matrix and extracellular space. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.369 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINGO2 | NM_001258282.3 | c.-394-49481C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 6 | ENST00000698399.1 | NP_001245211.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINGO2 | ENST00000698399.1 | c.-394-49481C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 6 | NM_001258282.3 | ENSP00000513694.1 | ||||
| LINGO2 | ENST00000698401.1 | c.-764-49481C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 7 | ENSP00000513696.1 | |||||
| LINGO2 | ENST00000698402.1 | c.-549-49481C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 7 | ENSP00000513697.1 | |||||
| LINGO2 | ENST00000698404.1 | c.-505-49481C>G | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 8 | ENSP00000513699.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.243 AC: 36781AN: 151606Hom.: 4863 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
36781
AN:
151606
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.242 AC: 36779AN: 151720Hom.: 4859 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.250 AC XY: 18495AN XY: 74112 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
36779
AN:
151720
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18495
AN XY:
74112
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
6356
AN:
41396
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
5733
AN:
15208
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
574
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1482
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1297
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3421
AN:
10516
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
56
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
17139
AN:
67872
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
551
AN:
2100
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1391
2782
4173
5564
6955
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
384
768
1152
1536
1920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1006
AN:
3470
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.