rs648387

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.10064-15G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.383 in 1,571,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 117,798 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.40 ( 12447 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.38 ( 105351 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.97

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.96).
BP6
Variant 11-103253270-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103253270-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93527.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.466 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001080463.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2
MANE Plus Clinical
c.10064-15G>T
intron
N/ANP_001073932.1
DYNC2H1
NM_001377.3
MANE Select
c.10043-15G>T
intron
N/ANP_001368.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
DYNC2H1
ENST00000650373.2
MANE Plus Clinical
c.10064-15G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000497174.1
DYNC2H1
ENST00000375735.7
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.10043-15G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000364887.2
DYNC2H1
ENST00000334267.11
TSL:1
c.2205+118851G>T
intron
N/AENSP00000334021.7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.401
AC:
60708
AN:
151432
Hom.:
12431
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.471
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.543
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.305
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.325
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.450
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.454
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.369
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.329
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.380
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.394
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.362
AC:
84744
AN:
234080
AF XY:
0.365
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.471
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.229
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.326
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.445
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.360
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.361
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.355
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.381
AC:
540843
AN:
1419540
Hom.:
105351
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.383
AC XY:
269602
AN XY:
704420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.465
AC:
14863
AN:
31958
American (AMR)
AF:
0.238
AC:
10089
AN:
42446
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.322
AC:
8131
AN:
25230
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.494
AC:
19335
AN:
39176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.433
AC:
34748
AN:
80188
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.362
AC:
19007
AN:
52490
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.353
AC:
1976
AN:
5602
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.379
AC:
410308
AN:
1083876
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.382
AC:
22386
AN:
58574
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.418
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14110
28220
42329
56439
70549
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13180
26360
39540
52720
65900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.401
AC:
60755
AN:
151548
Hom.:
12447
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.401
AC XY:
29656
AN XY:
74032
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.471
AC:
19465
AN:
41316
American (AMR)
AF:
0.304
AC:
4630
AN:
15210
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.325
AC:
1125
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.449
AC:
2307
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.453
AC:
2177
AN:
4806
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.369
AC:
3869
AN:
10474
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.327
AC:
96
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.380
AC:
25768
AN:
67832
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.392
AC:
825
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1758
3517
5275
7034
8792
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
586
1172
1758
2344
2930
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.300
Hom.:
1469
Bravo
AF:
0.397
Asia WGS
AF:
0.447
AC:
1553
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 08, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency

Mar 03, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Short rib-polydactyly syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.96
CADD
Benign
0.14
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
-3.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs648387; hg19: chr11-103123999; COSMIC: COSV62106412; API